Teams

SGraff.40.3.5M-DUR

2026 Eno River Mixed 40 & Over · 40 & Over Mixed 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.31 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-30vs PBream-UNCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMax Lipshitz / Meghan Smith vs JAMES MONTAGUE / Hannah White7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRavi Verma / Kari Lovetinsky vs Peter Bream / Kristi Laan3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChris Reeves / Mary T Long vs Derek Saccoccio / Jean Haas1-6, 2-6
2026-07-30vs LHsu-HRLost 12
L#1 DoublesRegina Davis / Chris Reeves vs Abigail Hatcher / Andrew Nelsen2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLoralie Bible / Tom Luben vs Rebecca Walsh / Sam Berger6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Graff / Zach Rowles vs Rhiannon Ludington / Andrew Curso1-6, 1-6
2026-07-16vs LStanek-HRLost 03
L#1 DoublesLoralie Bible / Ravi Verma vs Chris Roessler / Pilneyo Seo3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesChris Reeves / Kari Lovetinsky vs Lance Long / Lindsay Stanek4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesZach Rowles / Kristin Isaacs vs Jennifer Gillie / Aaron Kirschenfeld0-6, 1-6
2026-07-02vs ABaxley.40.3.5-DURLost 02
L#1 DoublesMeghan Smith / Ravi Verma vs Edward Bernier / Sara Velarde6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Graff / Chris Reeves vs Angela Baxley / Greg Fitts3-6, 5-7
2026-06-25vs JHaslett-UNCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMax Lipshitz / Meghan Smith vs Erin Berliner / Meng Chen6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMary T Long / Chris Reeves vs Marianne Gildea / Adam Hantman6-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesTom Luben / Regina Davis vs Kristopher Karvelas / Vera Halpern6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2026-06-18vs JHensley-DURLost 12
L#1 DoublesMeghan Smith / Max Lipshitz vs Devon Siege / Ryan Jobling5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMaryJo McNeill / Chris Reeves vs Jennifer Hensley / Lou Hensley6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKaren Schmitz / Zach Rowles vs LUCY LAV / Chun Lav3-6, 4-6
2026-06-11vs PBream-UNCLost 12
L#1 DoublesLoralie Bible / Max Lipshitz vs James White / Elaine Yeh6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRegina Davis / Zach Rowles vs Derek Saccoccio / Miho Ogura3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRavi Verma / MaryJo McNeill vs Danyu Lin / Hannah White7-5, 6-2
2026-06-04vs LHsu-HRWon 21
W#1 DoublesMax Lipshitz / Regina Davis vs Rebecca Walsh / Jefferson Balin6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesZach Rowles / MaryJo McNeill vs Rhiannon Ludington / Aaron Lubeck2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesChris Reeves / Loralie Bible vs Sara Lawrence / Matthew Feldt6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 40 & Over Mixed 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LHsu-HR7116818180
2PBream-UNC5315918170
3LStanek-HR5316818183
4JHensley-DUR53141022209
5ABaxley.40.3.5-DUR35121227212
6SGraff.40.3.5M-DUR35101432243
7JHaslett-UNC0812346291

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Loralie Bible
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.48
Meghan Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Max Lipshitz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Ravi Verma
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Zach Rowles
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.20
Scott Jolly
published
3.18
Chris Reeves
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.17
Regina Davis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.94
Susan Graff
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.81
Kari Lovetinsky
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Kristin Isaacs
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.79
Tom Luben
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.78
Mary T Long
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
MaryJo McNeill
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.70
Karen Schmitz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Isaacs + Tom Luben123 matchesnot enough data
Susan Graff + Tom Luben123 matchesnot enough data
Meghan Smith + Max Lipshitz213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Loralie Bible
182W–64L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Meghan Smith
160W–93L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
Max Lipshitz
14W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Ravi Verma
35W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Zach Rowles
107W–61L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
Scott Jolly
28W–12L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Chris Reeves
6W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Regina Davis
27W–45L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17
Susan Graff
27W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Kari Lovetinsky
116W–121L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Kristin Isaacs
111W–164L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.80
3
Tom Luben
85W–115L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Mary T Long
27W–68L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
MaryJo McNeill
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Karen Schmitz
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.