Teams

BC - WestEnd/BrentBlackman

2022 SOCAL Doubles - Beach Cities · BC Men - 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.86 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-11-19vs BC - MCC/JanetWisialowskiWon 10
W#2 DoublesHoward Kim / Edward Schuh vs Stephen Testa / Mike Yogi6-1, 6-0
2022-11-12vs BC - Kramer/ChristopherBallWon 10
W#2 DoublesChristopher Wiet / Edward Schuh vs Vitaliy Rusakov / Kevin Amaya6-3, 6-2
2022-10-22vs BC - AltaVista/TylerBarnhardtWon 10
W#1 DoublesJose Ocampo / Edward Schuh vs Venk Tatineni / Ethan Waldman6-3, 6-3
2022-10-15vs BC - MiraCosta/MarkWarshawWon 10
W#1 DoublesEdward Ng / Edward Schuh vs Gowrishankar Natarajan / Rajkumar Govindaraj7-5, 6-2
2022-09-17vs BC -LLW-AltaVista/JamesHartLost 01
L#1 DoublesHoward Kim / Edward Schuh vs Derek Berz / Tim Nguyen2-6, 2-6
2022-09-10vs BC - PVTC/BrianO'SullivanWon 10
W#2 DoublesEdward Schuh / Brent Blackman vs Lennie Brand / Anthony Choe6-0, 6-1
2022-09-03vs BC - AltaVista/TylerBarnhardtWon 10
W#1 DoublesEdward Schuh / Jose Ocampo vs Ethan Waldman / Darren Church6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Men - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Kako Mendez
published
3.85
Edward Schuh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
Barry St John
published 4
3.70
Jose Ocampo
published 4
3.67
Christopher Wiet
published 4
3.59
Brent Blackman
published 4
3.52
Keith French
published
3.40
Brad Jacobson
published 3.5
3.35
Yeerik Moy
published
3.31
Karl Ziegler
published
3.31
Mohammad Holil
published
3.25
Peter DeVries
published
3.22
Edgar Paz
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jose Ocampo + Edward Schuh5457% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kako Mendez
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Edward Schuh
124W–80L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Barry St John
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Jose Ocampo
52W–43L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Christopher Wiet
14W–14L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Brent Blackman
2W–10L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Keith French
21W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%42%58%
3.52
3.5
Brad Jacobson
16W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.40
Yeerik Moy
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
Karl Ziegler
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Mohammad Holil
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Peter DeVries
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Edgar Paz
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.