Teams

F 3.5S/7.0D NC Kelleher

2022 NEOTA Fusion · NEOTA 3.5S

16 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings15 teams · NEOTA 3.5S
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1F 3.5S/7.0D MM1 Caldera9037823283
2F 3.5S/7.0D TP2 Fox91331743408
3F 3.5S/7.0D MV2 Haught71271328276
4F 3.5S/7.0D NC Kelleher73321841369
5F 3.5S/7.0D LT Galehouse64321843390
6F 3.5S/7.0D PW Mikolich54212455425
7F 3.5S/7.0D PM Kozik55252558474
8F 3.5S/7.0D WR Davis44202043350
9F 3.5S/7.0D MV1 Connell44211945361
10F 3.5S/7.0D WE Ayyappan35192145377
11F 3.5S/7.0D CV Frederick26132761420
12F 3.5S/7.0D MM2 Paul27172863433
13F 3.5S/7.0D CSC Langmack27153065458
14F 3.5S/7.0D TP1 Fox28143676509
15F 3.5S/7.0D BR Sweeney19143676531

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Michelle Dalton
published
3.82
Kay McHolm
published
Jaimie Crumbley
published 4
3.60
Michelle Rich
published
3.53
Philip Canadas
published
3.46
Rex Degler
published
3.40
Stephanie Kurtz
published
3.25
Shawn Monahan
published
3.08
Dee Kelleher
published 3.5
3.08
Glenn Kerr
published 3.5
3.07
Timothy Booher
published
3.05
David Stucki
published 3.5
2.75
Munir Ahmad
published
Julie McCann
published
Keena Hutcheson
published
Matthew Johnston
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Johnston + Rex Degler7163% games+17.6% vs expected
Keena Hutcheson + Kay McHolm8265% games+12.8% vs expected
Munir Ahmad + Shawn Monahan4359% games+7.4% vs expected
Julie McCann + Michelle Rich9259% games+6.9% vs expected
Keena Hutcheson + Dee Kelleher16561% games+6.6% vs expected
Keena Hutcheson + Michelle Rich4353% games+6.4% vs expected
Michelle Rich + Stephanie Kurtz3353% games+4.3% vs expected
David Stucki + Rex Degler3350% games+3.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Dalton
84W–46L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
4.16
Kay McHolm
124W–45L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Jaimie Crumbley
53W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Rich
131W–90L career · no lines in 2022
<1%23%77%
3.60
Philip Canadas
85W–133L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
Rex Degler
157W–85L career · no lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.46
Stephanie Kurtz
61W–28L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%21%
3.40
Shawn Monahan
104W–78L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Dee Kelleher
96W–118L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Glenn Kerr
58W–116L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.08
Timothy Booher
87W–91L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.07
3.5
David Stucki
58W–83L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.05
Munir Ahmad
111W–76L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Julie McCann
26W–31L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Keena Hutcheson
53W–37L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Matthew Johnston
30W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.