Johnson - Genesis, Rock Rock

2023 KS 55 & Over Adult League · 9.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 4.50 / KANSAS

Flight standings1 teams · 9.0 Women

Team	W	L	Ind. W	Ind. L	Sets lost	Games lost
1Johnson - Genesis, Rock Rock	0	0	0	0	0	0

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94

Deborah Zrubek

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5

3.93

Janice Price

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published —

3.78

Diane Werner

usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Zrubek + Janice Price	33–13	57% games	+0.1% vs expected

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5

Deborah Zrubek

57W–28L career · 4 lines in 2023

67%33%<1%

3.94

—

Janice Price

79W–46L career · 3 lines in 2023

71%29%<1%

3.93

4.5

Diane Werner

88W–85L career · 3 lines in 2023

95%5%<1%

3.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.