Teams

Green and Mean

2025 18&Over Women · 3.0

17 players · average NTRP 2.95 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-10vs Dare DoublesWon 31
W#1 DoublesKarina Sanzari / Aleksandra Szymanski vs Fran Goldberg / Karen Hart6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesLorraine Davis vs Janet Fallon6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSusan Koshy / Diana Arce vs Danielle Klein / Marianne Brodeck6-7, 3-3
W#3 DoublesCarmen Tucaben / Maria Ponzio vs Dawn Foster / Michelle Stewart6-1, 6-3
2025-07-03vs Eastern/Choi/18&Over3.0WLost 14
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Simeone / Carmen Tucaben vs Michele Panzitta / Shannon Kang3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJulia Munoz vs Iris Lee3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAleksandra Szymanski / Karina Sanzari vs Gretchen Arcila / Sool Park2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesMaria Ponzio vs Hee Kyung Oak6-4, 5-5
L#3 DoublesDiana Arce / Fei Xie vs Sunah Kim / Janna Kersting2-6, 5-7
2025-06-12vs Sweeter ShotsLost 01
L#1 DoublesKarina Sanzari / Carmen Tucaben vs Mariquit Corcoran / Marisa Carr3-6, 1-6
2025-06-05vs Dare DoublesWon 32
L#1 DoublesMaria Ponzio / Carmen Tucaben vs Fran Goldberg / Stephanie Springer2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesLorraine Davis vs Nina Guinchard6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Koshy / Francesca Giordano-Ferrara vs Katherine Pizzo / Julie Wright6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesAndrea Mayendia vs Janet Fallon6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAnne Marie Carroll / Elizabeth Simeone vs Michelle Stewart / Dawn Foster6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-05-29vs Eastern/Choi/18&Over3.0WLost 05
L#1 DoublesSamantha Koth / Susan Koshy vs Gaohn Lee / Seung Ah Choi3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMaria Ponzio vs Violette de Bartillat2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Simeone / Fei Xie vs Minhyeong Kim / Seoyun Jeong1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAndrea Mayendia vs Irene Lee3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKarina Sanzari / Carmen Tucaben vs Ara Seok / Sool Park0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Aleksandra Szymanski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
Karina Sanzari
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Diana Arce
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.77
Maria Ponzio
usually #3 Doubles 20%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Anne Marie Carroll
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Fei Xie
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Francesca Giordano-Ferrara
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jackie Vignone
published 3
2.70
Carmen Tucaben
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.65
Andrea Mayendia
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.51
Elizabeth Simeone
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.33
Julia Munoz
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Bonnie Evans
published 2.5
Dorothy Szpet
published 2.5
Lorraine Davis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Samantha Koth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Koshy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Francesca Giordano-Ferrara + Maria Ponzio3646% games−0.4% vs expected
Elizabeth Simeone + Karina Sanzari6744% games−5.7% vs expected
Karina Sanzari + Carmen Tucaben7163% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Simeone + Carmen Tucaben2443% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Simeone + Maria Ponzio1432% gamesnot enough data
Karina Sanzari + Anne Marie Carroll134 matchesnot enough data
Karina Sanzari + Aleksandra Szymanski224 matchesnot enough data
Dorothy Szpet + Anne Marie Carroll134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Aleksandra Szymanski
23W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
Karina Sanzari
42W–31L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Diana Arce
14W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.94
Maria Ponzio
34W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Anne Marie Carroll
8W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Fei Xie
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Francesca Giordano-Ferrara
10W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Jackie Vignone
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Carmen Tucaben
28W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Andrea Mayendia
14W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Elizabeth Simeone
22W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
2.51
Julia Munoz
1W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
91%9%<1%
2.33
2.5
Bonnie Evans
7W–31L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Dorothy Szpet
4W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lorraine Davis
9W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Samantha Koth
9W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Susan Koshy
33W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.