Teams

DCarmazzi (Matthews Tennis)

2024 Adult 65 & Over League · 65 & Over Adult 4.0 Women - Fri AM - 11AM

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-04-19vs MFigard (Matthews)Won 20
W#1 DoublesJanet Baker / Martha Wells vs Sally Lowrance / Suzanne Roxburgh6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDebbie Carmazzi / Rosemary Hill vs Dorothy Gandar / Karen Watford6-1, 6-4
2024-04-12vs MFigard (Matthews)Won 10
W#2 DoublesJanet Baker / Martha Wells vs Sally Lowrance / Patti Ratcliffe6-4, 6-0
2024-04-05vs MFigard (Matthews)Won 10
W#2 DoublesRosemary Hill / Martha Wells vs Beverly Moore / Karen Watford6-2, 6-0
2024-03-22vs MFigard (Matthews)Won 20
W#1 DoublesDebbie Carmazzi / Saundra Denny vs Beverly Moore / Cindy Varner6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMartha Wells / Rosemary Hill vs Suzanne Roxburgh / Sue Busby6-1, 6-2
2024-03-20vs MFigard (Matthews)Won 20
W#1 DoublesDebbie Carmazzi / Saundra Denny vs Cindy Varner / Beverly Moore6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMartha Wells / Nicole Morris vs Sue Busby / Sally Lowrance6-2, 0-1
2024-03-08vs MFigard (Matthews)Won 20
W#2 DoublesDebbie Carmazzi / Dee Wilson vs Anne Sykes / Patti Ratcliffe6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRosemary Hill / Martha Wells vs Dorothy Gandar / Karen Watford6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & Over Adult 4.0 Women - Fri AM - 11AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Marty Corley
published
3.98
JoAnn Crolley
published
3.88
Sharon Greene
published
3.87
Dee Wilson
published 4
3.71
Janet Baker
published
3.69
Debbie Carmazzi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Saundra Denny
published
3.57
Martha Wells
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.53
Rosemary Hill
published
3.41
Nicole Morris
published
Lindsey Linker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Carmazzi + Janet Baker4173% games+4.5% vs expected
JoAnn Crolley + Marty Corley9071% games+3.3% vs expected
Martha Wells + Nicole Morris404 matchesnot enough data
Janet Baker + Nicole Morris123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marty Corley
9W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
4.00
JoAnn Crolley
11W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.98
Sharon Greene
21W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.88
4
Dee Wilson
11W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.87
Janet Baker
37W–32L career · no lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Debbie Carmazzi
68W–28L career · 4 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
Saundra Denny
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Martha Wells
99W–67L career · 6 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.57
Rosemary Hill
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.53
Nicole Morris
22W–21L career · no lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
3.41
Lindsey Linker
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.