Teams

PC-Otto

2025 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 WOMEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.88 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-10-26vs HRAC-Dey Hood RiverLost 03
L#1 DoublesCyd Bothum / Jill Montgomery vs Stacy Birch / Leslie Jones4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLorena Mayuga / Xia Suter vs Lori Robertson / Allison Crisp5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKristy Peacock / Val Otto vs Karen Ford / Michele Beaman2-6, 2-6
2024-10-26vs Park Fit Club-Northpark & FriendsLost 03
L#1 DoublesVal Otto / Xia Suter vs Tracie Kuka / Susan Morrison0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDawn Degrasse / Jill Montgomery vs Laura Cremers / Rene Reighard7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRebecca Gardner / Cyd Bothum vs Cathy Crowson / Karen Mathews0-6, 3-6
2024-10-25vs Park Fit Club-Northpark & FriendsLost 12
W#1 DoublesJill Montgomery / Dawn Degrasse vs Rene Reighard / Laura Cremers7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesVal Otto / Lorena Mayuga vs Karen Mathews / Cathy Crowson3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCyd Bothum / Rebecca Gardner vs Susan Morrison / Tracie Kuka2-6, 5-7
2024-10-25vs HRAC-Dey Hood RiverLost 12
W#1 DoublesJill Montgomery / Val Otto vs Stacy Birch / Karen Ford7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDawn Degrasse / Cyd Bothum vs Michele Dearing / Allison Crisp0-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKristy Peacock / Xia Suter vs Lori Robertson / Leslie Jones6-3, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 8.0 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HRAC-Dey Hood River40102889
2EW-WRAC-Houghton2163771
3CBRC-White21451078
4Park Fit Club-Northpark & Friends226613105
5Park Fit-Central Park Hagen12451185
6PEAK-Enyeart12451190
7PC-Otto0421020139

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cyd Bothum
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.59
Val Otto
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.55
Dawn Degrasse
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.54
Xia Suter
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Kristy Peacock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lorena Mayuga
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rebecca Gardner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cyd Bothum + Rebecca Gardner1535% gamesnot enough data
Kristy Peacock + Val Otto224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cyd Bothum
2W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Val Otto
33W–63L career · 4 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Dawn Degrasse
88W–115L career · 7 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
3.5
Xia Suter
52W–54L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.54
Kristy Peacock
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lorena Mayuga
4W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Gardner
2W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.