Teams

Ja.Bossert40C2.5

2026 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-15vs La.Shelby40CWon 21
W#1 DoublesMargaret Barham / Angela Alford vs Angie McNeill / Jennifer Bent6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJane Bossert / Jennifer Cotner vs Kari Marotta / Susan Gentry6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRachel Bonistalli / Grace Poole vs Jana Inman / Darcy Louzao3-6, 4-6
2026-08-08vs De.Farmer40C2.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Cotner / Deicy Love vs Carol Ann Mcmillan / Kacey Barcliff6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAngela Alford / Katherine Jackson vs Patrice Farmer / Clarissa McMathis6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKathryn Barton / Susan Furr vs Henriette Nshunguye / Tiffany Scotton1-6, 2-6
2026-08-01vs Te.Marcott40CWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaura Robison / Deicy Love vs Ann Flores / Cindy Markham3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Furr / Grace Poole vs Carrie Janovich / Heidi Doyle3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJane Bossert / Angela Alford vs Lorna Hirsch / Terry Richard6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ja.Bossert40C2.53072672
2La.Shelby40C1133762
3Er.Mobley40C1133856
4De.Farmer40C2.512451282
5Te.Marcott40C02151162

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.36 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.69
Deicy Love
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.54
Jennifer Cotner
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.52
Laura Robison
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.45
Margaret Barham
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.41
Angela Alford
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.31
Kristin Wehmeyer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.30
Jane Bossert
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.25
Grace Poole
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.07
Rachel Bonistalli
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.06
Susan Furr
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Deicy Love
55W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%9%91%
2.69
2.5
Jennifer Cotner
36W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%40%60%
2.54
Laura Robison
11W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
0%43%57%
2.52
Margaret Barham
15W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%64%36%
2.45
2.5
Angela Alford
7W–2L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%74%26%
2.41
Kristin Wehmeyer
13W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.31
Jane Bossert
10W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.30
Grace Poole
11W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
Rachel Bonistalli
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Susan Furr
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.