Teams

Ed.Perkins18C

2023 Cap Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-10-19vs Ra.Xu18CSplit 11
W#1 DoublesScott St John / Doug Silverman vs Istvan Pataki / Baaqir Yusuf6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDarin Meyer / Adam Dailey vs Raymond Xu / Sergii Porokh6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2023-08-27vs Ca.Collado18CWon 20
W#1 DoublesDarin Meyer / Max Stevenson vs Pedro Loaiza / Siva Pal4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesScott St John / Doug Silverman vs Brian Soltz / Mark Wood6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2023-08-20vs St.Wingo18C7.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesRyan Lindsay / Adam Dailey vs Roy Kelly / Anthony Womack6-2, 6-3
2023-08-13vs Br.Townsend18CWon 20
W#1 DoublesScott St John / Adam Dailey vs Brett Compton / Jason Hill6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDarin Meyer / Daniel Shields vs Thomas Taylor / Greg Kempf6-2, 7-5
2023-08-06Won 10
W#2 DoublesScott St John / Doug Silverman vs Nicholas Ballew / William Mooney6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Max Stevenson
published
3.92
Adam Dailey
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.83
Matthew Horney
published
3.79
Darin Meyer
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Ryan Lindsay
published
Camilo Pena
published 4
3.74
Sterling Thomas
published
3.70
Scott St John
published
3.68
Howard Marsilio
published
3.61
Doug Silverman
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.52
David Dare
published 3.5
2.98
Edward Perkins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Darin Meyer + Scott St John123 matchesnot enough data
Adam Dailey + Doug Silverman213 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Horney + Sterling Thomas123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Max Stevenson
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
4.14
4
Adam Dailey
148W–68L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.92
Matthew Horney
9W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Darin Meyer
60W–49L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
Ryan Lindsay
12W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Camilo Pena
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sterling Thomas
12W–8L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
Scott St John
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
Howard Marsilio
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Doug Silverman
99W–41L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
<1%22%78%
3.61
3.5
David Dare
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.52
Edward Perkins
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
2.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.