Teams

Shewmake

2025 Lubbock Adult Mixed League 18 & Over · 6.0 Adult Mixed

14 players · average NTRP 3.19 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-27vs CopelandWon 30
W#1 DoublesStephen Manning / Ali Hamilton vs Ashley Copeland / Hayden Farquhar6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKim Shewmake / Brandon Hamilton vs Blake Childress / Amy Wimmers7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDevin Street / Travis Isom vs Jin Lee / Leslie Morgan3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-07-26vs Landrum/LottWon 10
W#2 DoublesKay Miller / Dan Odom vs Ashlyn Landrum / Jaxon Lott6-2, 6-2
2025-07-21vs BoggsLost 01
L#1 DoublesPatrick Griffin / Kay Miller vs Kelly Welch / Adrian Toledo1-6, 2-6
2025-07-14vs PermenterWon 10
W#3 DoublesTravis Isom / Kay Miller vs Marty Cleckler / Anna Purdue4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-07-07Won 10
W#3 DoublesBrandon Hamilton / Kay Miller vs Emily Jenkins / Mark Jenkins6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Adult Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Ali Hamilton
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.44
Amy Catlin
published 3.5
3.34
Kim Shewmake
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Devin Street
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Emily Manning
published
3.04
Travis Isom
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Brandon Hamilton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.97
Stephen Manning
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Kay Miller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.84
Clair Jones
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
Dan Odom
published 3
2.78
Patrick Griffin
published
2.65
Kaci Griffin
published
2.54
Colton Street
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ali Hamilton
29W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.62
3.5
Amy Catlin
29W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
Kim Shewmake
25W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Devin Street
14W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Emily Manning
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Travis Isom
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Brandon Hamilton
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Stephen Manning
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Kay Miller
10W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
2.90
3
Clair Jones
9W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Dan Odom
3W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Patrick Griffin
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Kaci Griffin
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Colton Street
1W–10L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.