← Teams

Burkwood McKelvey

2022 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 4.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-08-22vs Woodlake UrbanSplit 1–1
L#2 SinglesSam McKelvey vs Chris Lee1-6, 6-7
W#3 SinglesTyler Sinsabaugh vs Patrick Urban6-2, 6-3
2022-08-19vs Southhampton RomeroWon 1–0
W#3 SinglesTyler Sinsabaugh vs Heath Flohre6-4, 6-2
2022-08-04vs Westwood RabhanLost 0–2
L#2 SinglesSam McKelvey vs Kory Painter5-7, 2-6
L#3 SinglesTyler Sinsabaugh vs Brian Rabhan2-6, 4-6
2022-07-28vs Westwood FraserWon 1–0
W#2 SinglesSam McKelvey vs Mark Reams6-2, 6-1
2022-07-07vs ACAC HollomonWon 1–0
W#2 SinglesSam McKelvey vs Jeff Bosch6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
LUDINEI PICELLI
published —
4.04
Tyler Sinsabaugh
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4.5
3.78
Sam McKelvey
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.77
Chris Gillam
published 4
3.62
Michael Hazelwood
published —
—
Chad Eldridge
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tyler Sinsabaugh + Sam McKelvey7–456% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

—
LUDINEI PICELLI
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
4.07
4.5
Tyler Sinsabaugh
141W–63L career · 3 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
4.04
4
Sam McKelvey
158W–91L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Chris Gillam
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
—
Michael Hazelwood
14W–21L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
3.5
Chad Eldridge
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.