Teams

*2-LCaldwell-SVC

2024 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women Evening

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-04-23vs *4-LDubois-Eno-18 3.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesSandra Stowe / Ann Flodin vs Danielle Nader / Elizabeth Enderline6-4, 6-0
2024-04-16vs *5-TDavies-CHCC 3.0Won 20
W#2 SinglesAnn Flodin vs Courtney Whilden6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLaura Caldwell / Debbie Castiller vs Tracy Davies / Adrian Davies6-3, 6-1
2024-04-09vs *1-CGonzales-EnoWon 10
W#2 SinglesAnn Flodin vs Ragini Singh6-4, 7-6
2024-03-26vs *3-ENeilson-EnoLost 02
L#1 SinglesAnn Flodin vs Eleanor Neilson4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDebbie Castiller / Kyle Wolf vs Kathleen Young / Joselyn McDonald3-6, 5-7
2024-03-19vs *4-LDubois-Eno-18 3.0Won 20
W#1 SinglesAnn Flodin vs Christina Pipkin7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDebbie Castiller / Dawn Kleinman vs Michele Mulcahy / Annaliese Gresham7-6, 6-3
2024-03-05vs *1-CGonzales-EnoWon 20
W#2 DoublesDebbie Castiller / Kyle Wolf vs Cecilia Gonzales / Cristina Salvador6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAnn Flodin / Jennifer Magee vs Krissy Dunn / Jennifer Huggins6-2, 6-3
2024-02-20vs *3-ENeilson-EnoWon 20
W#2 SinglesAnn Flodin vs Polly Creveling6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDebbie Castiller / Kyle Wolf vs Sharon Fadelici / Jolie LeBrun4-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Erin McElligott
published
3.15
Ann Flodin
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
3.15
Laura Caldwell
published
3.15
Naomi Worden
published
3.12
Dawn Kleinman
published 3
3.08
Debbie Castiller
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.92
Laura Gallaher
published
2.81
Kyle Wolf
published
2.79
Carli Opland
published 3
2.69
Alison Moseley
published 3
Melinda Wright
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erin McElligott
15W–16L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
3
Ann Flodin
65W–23L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%13%87%
3.15
Laura Caldwell
37W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%14%86%
3.15
Naomi Worden
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
3
Dawn Kleinman
18W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%19%81%
3.12
3
Debbie Castiller
189W–106L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%29%71%
3.08
Laura Gallaher
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
2.92
Kyle Wolf
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Carli Opland
33W–26L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Alison Moseley
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
Melinda Wright
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.