Teams

LKulp.7.5C-SVC

2026 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo 7.5 Women Eve

15 players · average NTRP 3.63 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 17 6:30 PM
Southern Village Club LLC
Sep 24 6:30 PM
Chapel Hill Country Club
Oct 1 6:30 PM
Southern Village Club LLC
Oct 8 6:30 PM
Whippoorwill Park
2026-08-27vs KLaan-DURLost 12
L#1 DoublesEve Hammett / Tiffany Langino vs Amy Gillespie / Randy Smith4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesChristine Sudzina Schut / Sallie Nowacek vs Kristi Laan / Alyse Levine3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMelissa Coward / Anne Stephens vs Megan Chiles / Kathryn Kabat3-6, 2-6
2026-08-20vs GArtis-DURWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnn Skvarcius / Tiffany Langino vs Kensy Ryan / Courtney Sparr6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLauren Kulp / Cynthia Moody vs Victoria Tomlin / Sarah Baldwin6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesErin McElligott / Katie Naftel vs Omojojadavwe Suzette Morales / Angela Davis6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · 18 & Over Combo 7.5 Women Eve
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LKulp.7.5C-SVC103008
2KLaan-DUR1030118
3LBible.7.5C-DUR1030228
4CHaywood-DUR1021329
5SFranks.7.5C-DUR1021330
6MEasterling18C-HVCC1021332
7TPerrone-DUR1021433
8CBaddour.18C-CHCC0112428
9CAvery.7.5C-CHTC0112430
10JRoss.7.5C-DUR0112531
11KEvans-DUR0112535
12MDaubert-DFC0103633
13MLong.7.5C-DUR0103635
14GArtis-DUR0103636

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Tiffany Langino
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.68
Erika Linnander
published 4
3.61
Elizabeth Heald
published 4
3.60
Christina Powers
published 4
3.60
Cynthia Moody
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.54
Eve Hammett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Ann Skvarcius
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Christine Sudzina Schut
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Lauren Kulp
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Anne Stephens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Amy Drew
published 3.5
3.31
Sallie Nowacek
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Katie Naftel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Melissa Coward
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Erin McElligott
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Sudzina Schut + Lauren Kulp7165% games+12.8% vs expected
Christine Sudzina Schut + Tiffany Langino8262% games+12.4% vs expected
Erin McElligott + Christine Sudzina Schut5161% games+7.7% vs expected
Christine Sudzina Schut + Melissa Coward13559% games+5.0% vs expected
Katie Naftel + Erin McElligott1443% games+0.1% vs expected
Eve Hammett + Tiffany Langino452955% games−0.9% vs expected
Katie Naftel + Christine Sudzina Schut5158% games−2.0% vs expected
Cynthia Moody + Sallie Nowacek7849% games−14.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tiffany Langino
244W–125L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Erika Linnander
9W–10L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Elizabeth Heald
16W–10L career · no lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.61
4
Christina Powers
30W–45L career · no lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.60
3.5
Cynthia Moody
27W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.60
3.5
Eve Hammett
132W–82L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.54
3.5
Ann Skvarcius
20W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Christine Sudzina Schut
149W–88L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Lauren Kulp
86W–37L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Anne Stephens
10W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Amy Drew
8W–7L career · no lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Sallie Nowacek
110W–79L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Katie Naftel
57W–53L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Melissa Coward
146W–74L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Erin McElligott
31W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.