Teams

Coral Reef Sharks (Valme)

2021 Miami-Dade Adult 40 & Over - Spring Day · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-04-24vs Anda (Doral Park)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJose Buezas / Ronald Valme vs Ennio de Vita / ROGER VALECILLOS7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2021-04-10vs Nunez (Royal Palm)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJose Buezas / Ronald Valme vs JOSE IGNACIO GONZALEZ NUNEZ / Ricardo Gross6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2021-03-20Won 10
W#2 DoublesRonald Valme / Jose Buezas vs Luis Garcia / Donato Calandriello6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2021-03-06Won 10
W#1 SinglesJose Buezas vs Saul Roif6-2, 6-2
2021-02-27vs Anda (Doral Park)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJack Astaphan / Jose Buezas vs Ennio de Vita / ROGER VALECILLOS6-0, 6-1
2021-02-20vs Miami-Dade - Doral Park/LebronWon 10
W#1 DoublesJose Buezas / Raymond Valme - (DQ) vs Fabrice Riviere / Ciro Vasquez4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-02-13vs Nunez (Royal Palm)Won 10
W#2 DoublesJose Buezas / Raymond Valme - (DQ) vs Javier Siu / Javier Zambrano6-3, 6-1
2021-02-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesRaymond Valme - (DQ) / Jose Buezas vs Antonio Ansoleaga / Alejandro Ansoleaga7-5, 6-2
2021-01-23vs Lehman (Dante Fascell)Won 10
W#1 DoublesRaymond Valme - (DQ) / Jose Buezas vs Ian van Walleghem / Mark Kessler6-2, 6-1
2021-01-16vs Kulcsar (Crandon)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJose Buezas / Jack Astaphan vs Jonathan Miller / SPYROS PRANTALOS6-3, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
Jose Buezas
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.97
Michael Wong
published
3.82
Jorge Casado
published
3.77
Gregory Joseph
published 4
3.76
Gerardo Perdigon
published 4
3.61
Glenn Davis
published 4
3.60
Gustavo Tijerino
published 4
3.54
3.45
Raymond Valme
published
3.44
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Giampaolo Guarino + Jean-Pierre Trouillot3343% games−2.1% vs expected
Gregory Joseph + Giampaolo Guarino0834% games−10.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jose Buezas
61W–19L career · 10 lines in 2021
<1%49%51%
4.50
Michael Wong
20W–18L career · no lines in 2021
<1%59%41%
3.97
Jorge Casado
4W–2L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Gregory Joseph
36W–38L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Gerardo Perdigon
28W–14L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Glenn Davis
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Gustavo Tijerino
5W–16L career · no lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.60
Jean-Pierre Trouillot
5W–9L career · no lines in 2021
39%61%<1%
3.54
Raymond Valme
1W–10L career · no lines in 2021
66%34%<1%
3.45
4
Giampaolo Guarino
3W–22L career · no lines in 2021
68%32%<1%
3.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.