Teams

La.Kane18S

2026 Capital Fall Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-09-02vs El.Robinson18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesEmilie Moses vs Sheri Erhart6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesLauren Kane vs Merrit Lumsden6-2, 6-2
2026-08-26vs Ta.Yasin18S3.0Won 30
W#1 SinglesMari Stratemeier vs LaTara Lewis4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesEmilie Moses vs Jane Snyder7-5, 6-2
W#3 SinglesLauren Kane vs Azariah Bell6-3, 6-4
2026-08-19vs St.Gupton18SWon 21
W#1 SinglesMari Stratemeier vs Annie Schlachter6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesEmilie Moses vs Kristin Baddour6-0, 6-0
L#3 SinglesLauren Kane vs Sydnor Coffman1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1La.Kane18S1021216
2Am.Brandon18S1021217
3Sh.Clarkson18S1021323
4El.Robinson18S0112426
5St.Gupton18S0112427
6Ha.Hughes18S0103636

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Mari Stratemeier
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.93
Keeley McCormick
published 3
2.87
Emilie Moses
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.46
Lauren Kane
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.22
Melis Hamevi Bukey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Kane + Emilie Moses4354% games+9.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Mari Stratemeier
86W–49L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Keeley McCormick
47W–39L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Emilie Moses
15W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
2.87
Lauren Kane
23W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%62%38%
2.46
Melis Hamevi Bukey
0W–9L career · no lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
2.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.