Teams

Sports Mall-Favila

2021 Fall Outdoor League-Saturday · 3.0W

13 players · average NTRP 3.20 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-10-23vs Sports Mall-Henderson/JensenLost 02
L#1 DoublesStephanie Knight / Lisa Armstrong vs Bethany Bodily / Amelia Jones4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKathrine Hansen / Noreen Roeca vs Angela Jensen / Brenda Green2-6, 2-6
2021-10-16vs Salt Lake Tennis-Bayna/BickmoreSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMargot Sharapova / Noreen Roeca vs Delia Bayna / Linda Byington0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLexie Williams / Stephanie Favila vs Karla Block / Nicole Leatham7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesStephanie Knight / Erin Bradley vs Magdalena Kovacsovics / Holly Ricker6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesStephanie Favila vs Krissie Summerhays2-6, 0-3
L#2 DoublesKim Kunde / Amy Watson vs Kelly Lund / Lindy Parks1-6, 2-6
2021-10-02vs Sports Mall-Henderson/JensenLost 02
L#1 SinglesMargot Sharapova vs Trisha Cutrer0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCamille Jensen / Kim Kunde vs Yoko Walljasper / DeeAnn Henderson0-6, 1-6
2021-09-25vs Salt Lake Tennis-Bayna/BickmoreLost 02
L#1 SinglesKim Kunde vs Emilee Hurley3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBrooke Rollins / Amy Watson vs Mari Bickmore / Nicole Leatham4-6, 6-7
L#1 DoublesBrooke Rollins / Amy Watson vs Jane Chandramouli / Nicole Fisher0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesCamille Jensen vs Erin Arico6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNoreen Roeca / Lexie Williams vs Melissa Barnett / Suzanne Headden6-2, 6-0
2021-09-11vs Sports Mall-Henderson/JensenLost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Armstrong / Setareh Hagen vs Shauna Lake / Esther Hatch0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesStephanie Favila vs Julie Black2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMargot Sharapova / Stephanie Knight vs Angela Jensen / Mary Jayne Child6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2021-08-28vs Salt Lake Tennis-Bayna/BickmoreLost 02
L#1 DoublesCamille Jensen / Kendall Aguilar vs Linda Byington / Nicole Leatham2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLisa Armstrong / Stephanie Favila vs Stef Charlesworth / LISA PERMENTER6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Erin Bradley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Brooke Rollins
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.58
Amy Watson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.41
Kendall Aguilar
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.35
Lisa Armstrong
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.26
Stephanie Favila
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
Camille Jensen
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Kathrine Hansen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kim Kunde
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Lexie Williams
published
Margot Sharapova
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Noreen Roeca
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Setareh Hagen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Armstrong + Brooke Rollins4259% gamesnot enough data
Amy Watson + Brooke Rollins134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Erin Bradley
145W–97L career · 1 line in 2021
5%94%1%
3.71
3.5
Brooke Rollins
56W–101L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Amy Watson
23W–36L career · 3 lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
2.58
3
Kendall Aguilar
46W–41L career · 5 lines in 2021
75%25%<1%
2.41
Lisa Armstrong
59W–152L career · 3 lines in 2021
88%12%<1%
2.35
2.5
Stephanie Favila
47W–119L career · 4 lines in 2021
0%97%3%
2.26
Camille Jensen
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kathrine Hansen
5W–17L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Kim Kunde
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lexie Williams
20W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Margot Sharapova
0W–10L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Noreen Roeca
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Setareh Hagen
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.