Teams

Williamson/55/4.0/WD/BOC

2025 BR Adult 55 & Over - Women Day · 4.0 BR (55&O) Women Day

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-17vs HILLER/55/4.0/WD/BRECLost 12
L#1 DoublesCindy Barksdale / Katie Blunschi vs Mindy Lovell / Lyndal Leggett3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Edmonson / Leanne Payne vs Patti Hiller / Cherrie Ferguson6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDonna Percle / Jayne Anderson vs Lacey Corripio / Mary Miller5-7, 0-6
2025-03-10vs Kinchen/55/4.0/WD/CCLWon 21
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Edmonson / Leanne Payne vs Marieke Crawford / Tina Moore6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLee Anne Tranchina / Krista Andry vs Jenny Rome / Becky Davis7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAndree Padial / Cindy Barksdale vs Shawn Mills / Angela Milazzo6-1, 6-2
2025-02-10vs HILLER/55/4.0/WD/BRECWon 21
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Edmonson / Cindy Barksdale vs Patti Hiller / Lacey Corripio6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle St Martin / Katie Blunschi vs Mary Miller / Claire Vecchio6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLee Anne Tranchina / Jayne Anderson vs Bekki Lockhart / Lyndal Leggett1-6, 2-6
2025-02-03vs Kinchen/55/4.0/WD/CCLLost 12
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Edmonson / Leanne Payne vs Kim Elston / Jenny Rome6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKatie Blunschi / Lee Anne Tranchina vs Dana Lanoix / Becky Davis4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLynn Williamson / Donna Percle vs Stephanie Kurzweg / Tina Moore3-6, 2-6
2025-01-29vs HILLER/55/4.0/WD/BRECWon 30
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Edmonson / Andree Padial vs Bekki Lockhart / Cherrie Ferguson6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLynn Williamson / Lee Anne Tranchina vs Patti Hiller / Lacey Corripio6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLeanne Payne / Cindy Barksdale vs Mindy Lovell / Sonya Porta6-1, 6-1
2025-01-13vs Kinchen/55/4.0/WD/CCLLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle St Martin / Krista Andry vs Tina Moore / Dana Lanoix5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Edmonson / Leanne Payne vs Lynn Brignac / Shawn Mills6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesLynn Williamson / Cindy Barksdale vs Lori Kinchen / Stephanie Kurzweg6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.0 BR (55&O) Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Kinchen/55/4.0/WD/CCL5111719172
2Williamson/55/4.0/WD/BOC3310818152
3HILLER/55/4.0/WD/BREC1561225171

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Andree Padial
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.95
Leanne Payne
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.87
Suzanne Edmonson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.80
Cindy Barksdale
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.71
Lynn Williamson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.68
Donna Percle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Michelle St Martin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.50
Katie Blunschi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.43
Jayne Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Krista Andry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Lee Anne Tranchina
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Barksdale + Suzanne Edmonson6264% games+6.7% vs expected
Cindy Barksdale + Andree Padial7063% games+4.6% vs expected
Suzanne Edmonson + Leanne Payne36263% games+3.6% vs expected
Suzanne Edmonson + Andree Padial6060% games+3.6% vs expected
Cindy Barksdale + Leanne Payne6258% games+3.5% vs expected
Cindy Barksdale + Lynn Williamson4162% games+0.4% vs expected
Katie Blunschi + Lynn Williamson4348% games−5.3% vs expected
Jayne Anderson + Donna Percle3440% games−9.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andree Padial
90W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.99
Leanne Payne
107W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.95
Suzanne Edmonson
96W–27L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Cindy Barksdale
53W–24L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
Lynn Williamson
30W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Donna Percle
13W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
Michelle St Martin
12W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.60
Katie Blunschi
11W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
Jayne Anderson
5W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.43
Krista Andry
2W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lee Anne Tranchina
20W–48L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.