Teams

M.Ladd

2023 Cap Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-05-25vs P.KellyLost 01
L#3 DoublesKevin Wolborsky / Philippe Adams vs Brian Baron / Zachariah Anderson3-6, 1-6
2023-05-22vs J.Byrd/B.EcklesWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavis Felts / Bruce Mildwurf vs Beomjun Ju / Jermaine Byrd6-1, 6-2
2023-05-21Won 10
W#3 DoublesMark Camacho / Philippe Adams vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-07Won 10
W#3 DoublesKevin Powell / Philippe Adams vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-04-23vs M.TreiresLost 12
W#1 DoublesJeff Vajay / Davis Felts vs Mark Treires / Jason Coble6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJohn Terry / Jack Baur vs Richard McClenny / Jason Abhau3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKevin Wolborsky / Philippe Adams vs Drew Slocum / Patrick Newsome2-6, 1-6
2023-04-16vs C.VinsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesPhilippe Adams / Davis Felts vs Cody Vinson / Shaun Ward6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesChristopher Brown / Jack Baur vs Rubens Vianna / Connor Funk4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-03-26vs J.Campbell - SARCLost 01
L#3 DoublesFred Black / Jack Baur vs T Brandon Brown / Jeff Chaffin3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2023-03-19vs J.Monaghen 4.5 18Split 11
L#1 DoublesDavis Felts / Fred Black vs Mickey Plowden / Jason Liner4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKevin Wolborsky / Philippe Adams vs Jeffrey Monaghen / Adam Thompson6-0, 5-7, 1-0
2023-03-12Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDavis Felts / Jack Baur vs Brian Maher / Jason Kinder2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.12 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Bruce Mildwurf
published 4.5
4.45
Jeff Vajay
published
4.35
Kevin Powell
published
4.20
Jack Baur
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 4.5
4.11
Davis Felts
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.88
Kevin Wolborsky
published
3.79
Philippe Adams
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.72
Mark Camacho
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jack Baur + Davis Felts2543% gamesnot enough data
Philippe Adams + Davis Felts033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Bruce Mildwurf
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
4.46
Jeff Vajay
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
4.45
Kevin Powell
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
4.35
4.5
Jack Baur
87W–51L career · 8 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
4.20
4.5
Davis Felts
63W–95L career · 5 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
4.11
Kevin Wolborsky
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Philippe Adams
81W–74L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.79
Mark Camacho
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.