Teams

Sarff - Highland Country Club

2025 Sandhills Tri Level 18 & over · 2.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.07 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-31vs Hallock - Methodist UniversityWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulia McDonald / Meredith Weinstein vs Melissa Parker / Peggy Schaefer6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCaroline Garber / Taylor England vs Dawn Burt / Jacqui Cannon6-3, 6-3
2025-07-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesMaria Fulcher / Courtney Hasty vs Ericka Zumwalt / Polly Miller7-5, 6-2
2025-06-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesLindsay Sarff / Maria Fulcher vs Polly Miller / Yuko Resseguie5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-06-03vs Combs - Gates FourWon 10
W#1 DoublesMaria Fulcher / Courtney Hasty vs Kathy Fick / Lynn Floyd1-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Lindsay Sarff
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Meredith Weinstein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Maria Fulcher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Courtney Hasty
published 3.5
3.06
Julia McDonald
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Taylor England
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Lyndsey Gardner
published
Allene Bullock
published 3
2.65
Madeline McFadyen
published
2.60
Martha Lerario
published
2.50
Maddie Cohen
published
2.50
Allison Davis
published 2.5
Caroline Garber
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lyndsey Gardner + Madeline McFadyen3348% gamesnot enough data
Lindsay Sarff + Meredith Weinstein314 matchesnot enough data
Lindsay Sarff + Maria Fulcher314 matchesnot enough data
Julia McDonald + Lindsay Sarff213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lindsay Sarff
71W–54L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%61%38%
3.46
Meredith Weinstein
26W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Maria Fulcher
44W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Courtney Hasty
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Julia McDonald
18W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
Taylor England
10W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
Lyndsey Gardner
13W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%3%97%
2.76
3
Allene Bullock
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Madeline McFadyen
18W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%15%85%
2.65
Martha Lerario
10W–29L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
Maddie Cohen
17W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%50%50%
2.50
3
Courtney Samuelson
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
2.50
2.5
Allison Davis
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Caroline Garber
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.