Teams

JMCC/Lynch

2026 COTA USTA Adult 18 & Over Business Women - Fall '25 · Business Women 2.5

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-26vs BP/ChamblissWon 21
W#1 DoublesGrayson Henderson / Joanne Steele vs Amy Murphy / Rachel Cabaniss6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesClaire Fortenberry vs Whitney Ostrander2-2
L#2 DoublesMary Jane Hassell / Heidi Beth Warren vs Paola de Santo / Angie Chambliss3-6, 3-6
2025-10-19vs COTA/Alison CunninghamSplit 11
W#1 SinglesClaire Fortenberry vs Mary Nicholson2-2
L#2 DoublesSusan Nixon / Mary Jane Hassell vs Sara Chambless / Sarah Hardell4-6, 4-6
2025-10-08vs BP/Crenshaw/YanceyLost 02
L#1 SinglesMary Jane Hassell vs Randi Baker6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesClaire Lynch / Rhonda Williams vs JESSICA PEZOLD / Brittney Beckom2-6, 4-6
2025-09-28vs ACC/SteeleLost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Jane Hassell / Susan Nixon vs Natalie French / Ashlee Kimbrell4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRhonda Williams / Jane Anne Ridings vs Lucy Ullrich / Kathleen Belknap1-6, 4-6
2025-09-14vs OVP/Underwood/DeanWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarrie Gray / Joanne Steele vs Stephanie Williams / Lelyne Paes Leme7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesClaire Fortenberry vs Jessica Myers6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRhonda Williams / Susan Nixon vs Tai Bright / Jessica Kanazawa6-0, 6-4
2025-09-07vs OVP/SnyderSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSusan Nixon / Rhonda Williams vs Jen Calabria / Tricia Kinnard3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAngie Garcia / Joanne Steele vs Megan McDevitt / Abby King6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Business Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.25 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.45
Claire Fortenberry
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.36
Joanne Steele
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.25
Claire Lynch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.21
Mary Jane Hassell
usually #4 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.17
Rhonda Williams
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.04
Jane Anne Ridings
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Grayson Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Heidi Beth Warren
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Claire Fortenberry
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%64%36%
2.45
Joanne Steele
6W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.36
2.5
Claire Lynch
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
Mary Jane Hassell
12W–11L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.21
Rhonda Williams
8W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
Jane Anne Ridings
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Grayson Henderson
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Heidi Beth Warren
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.