Teams

Julington Creek - Gavaller

2025 Duval Adult 40 & Over - Men · 4.5 Adult 40 & Over Men

14 players · average NTRP 4.42 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-02-23vs Southside - LeLost 01
L#2 DoublesSteven Mcgehee / Kenneth Wood vs Don Le / Daniel Nebus6-7, 3-6
2025-02-08vs Huguenot - RutsteinWon 10
W#2 DoublesSteven Mcgehee / David Frakt vs David Prichard / David Hartsfield6-3, 7-5
2025-02-02vs Huguenot - RutsteinWon 10
W#1 DoublesCristian Gavaller / Steven Mcgehee vs David Prichard / David Hartsfield6-0, 6-0
2025-02-01Lost 01
L#1 SinglesSteven Mcgehee vs Daniel Raisbeck3-6, 2-6
2025-01-25vs Southside - LeWon 10
W#3 DoublesSteven Mcgehee / Andy Tynan vs Kris Gouin / Louis Saig6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2025-01-11vs Duval/Morgan/40&Over4.5MWon 10
W#3 DoublesSteven Mcgehee / Kenneth Wood vs William Morgan / James Porterfield6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 40 & Over Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.08 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Steven Mcgehee
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.26
Jeffrey Henley
published
Andy Tynan
published 4.5
4.21
Cristian Gavaller
published 4.5
4.18
Eric Berzsenyi
published
4.18
Carl Scott
published 4.5
4.17
Jayant Gupta
published
4.17
Erinc Eslik
published
4.09
Cesar Chagas
published 4.5
4.04
David Frakt
published 4.5
3.98
David Randolph
published 4
3.73
Spencer Henderson
published
3.66
Thomas Bass
published
Kenneth Wood
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cristian Gavaller + Cesar Chagas3442% games−9.9% vs expected
Eric Berzsenyi + Cristian Gavaller123 matchesnot enough data
Jayant Gupta + Jeffrey Henley033 matchesnot enough data
Carl Scott + Jeffrey Henley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Steven Mcgehee
42W–51L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.29
Jeffrey Henley
12W–15L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Andy Tynan
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Cristian Gavaller
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.21
Eric Berzsenyi
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Carl Scott
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
Jayant Gupta
7W–15L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
4.17
Erinc Eslik
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
4.17
4.5
Cesar Chagas
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
4.09
4.5
David Frakt
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
4.04
4
David Randolph
15W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.98
Spencer Henderson
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Thomas Bass
81W–101L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Kenneth Wood
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.