Teams

MEveritt 40+ Combo

2022 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 7.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-10-05vs SLutherLost 01
L#1 DoublesZana Piric / Lola Jefferies vs Molly Briggs / Karen Ice6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2022-09-28Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Jo Dunnington / Jennifer Wray vs Daphne Driscoll / Monica Collins3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-09-21vs KPatreyLost 01
L#2 DoublesCamille Gibbs / Zana Piric vs Dara Haney / Allison DeMacy1-6, 6-7
2022-09-07vs Rice/HagensSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLaura Brenton / Zana Piric vs Jill David / Jessica Brock3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary Jo Dunnington / Laura Rendon vs Karen Hagens / Lily Li7-5, 6-3
2022-08-24vs CSweitzerWon 20
W#1 DoublesLola Jefferies / Zana Piric vs Rosemary Peters / Mary Tulenko6-0, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMary Jo Dunnington / Alicia Arana vs Mariana Lima Gonzalez / Kathy Demase6-4, 7-6
2022-08-17vs SLutherWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Wray / Zana Piric vs Christi Bowser / Julia Killian6-3, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Erin McAllister
published 4
3.58
Mary Jo Dunnington
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Sheila Riley
published
3.31
Zana Piric
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.26
Melissa House
published
3.12
Lola Jefferies
published
3.09
Elizabeth Schuette
published 3.5
3.08
Camille Gibbs
published 3.5
Laura Rendon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Schuette + Camille Gibbs224 matchesnot enough data
Sheila Riley + Erin McAllister123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Erin McAllister
26W–22L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
3.5
Mary Jo Dunnington
256W–119L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%27%73%
3.58
Sheila Riley
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
89%11%<1%
3.34
3.5
Zana Piric
135W–175L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.31
Melissa House
20W–20L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
Lola Jefferies
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Elizabeth Schuette
7W–12L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Camille Gibbs
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
Laura Rendon
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.