Teams

9.TOHS.Starritt

2022 CTRL Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.56 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-18vs 3.TOC.EvansWon 21
L#1 DoublesSue Sheldon / Tiffany Eastley vs Heather Pope / Lindsay Castret5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesStephannie Messina vs Omojojadavwe Suzette Morales6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesEmily Starritt / Shelly Jude vs Amy Condon / Sachiko Kuzume6-1, 6-2
2022-05-13vs 7.TOC.TriebertLost 13
L#1 SinglesShelly Jude vs Tenesha Carter1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesConnie Kim / Tanya Barcinas vs Kristen Fuller / Kelli Harris6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesStephannie Messina vs Emily Childs6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Jeska / Emily Starritt vs Sara Velarde / Kristen Clary7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2022-04-24vs 5.TOC.IrishWon 32
L#1 DoublesTanya Barcinas / Jennifer Straughn vs Anna Tomkins / Natalie Naramor1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesShelly Jude vs MacKenzie Williams5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTiffany Eastley / Suzanne Jeska vs Keely Williams / Nan Hu6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesEmily Starritt vs Meghan O'Hara6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSue Sheldon / Colin Liebling vs Caroline Irish / Lusia Li6-4, 6-0
2022-04-03vs 6.TOC.KempfLost 04
L#1 SinglesShelly Jude vs Angelica Rose2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTanya Barcinas / Susan Brogden vs Gillian Kelleher / Marina Barthalmus5-7, 5-7
L#2 SinglesSue Sheldon vs Melissa Hill6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Jeska / Stephannie Messina vs Heather Hofmann / Nicole Peterson2-6, 3-6
2022-03-28vs 4.TOC.EverittLost 13
L#1 DoublesSue Sheldon / Stephannie Messina vs Elizabeth Schuette / Alicia Arana5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesEmily Starritt vs Laura Rendon6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Jeska / Tiffany Eastley vs Camille Gibbs / Niezle Scott6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesTanya Barcinas vs Kelly Johnson6-4, 6-2
2022-03-21vs 2.MD.WilliamsSplit 11
L#1 SinglesShelly Jude vs Barbara Campbell0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTiffany Eastley / Suzanne Jeska vs Brooke Rawls / Dabney Sninski6-2, 6-3
2022-03-20vs 1.MD.MyersWon 21
L#1 DoublesConnie Kim / Suzanne Jeska vs Miho Ogura / Ashley McRae6-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesEmily Starritt vs Cait Bauer4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesShelly Jude / J Yau vs Rachel Brown / Christi-Ann Wiltberger6-3, 6-2
2022-03-06vs 8.TOHS.RiderLost 13
L#1 DoublesTanya Barcinas / Jennifer Straughn vs Jennifer Lefebvre / Laura Anderson3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesShelly Jude vs Kimberly Durland5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Jeska / Stephannie Messina vs Erica Fadool / Lindsey Ziglar6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesEmily Starritt / Tiffany Eastley vs Angela Ray / Deb Lanier3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Emily Starritt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.35
J Yau
published 3.5
3.30
Suzanne Jeska
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.29
Sue Sheldon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 13% · published 3.5
3.25
Stephannie Messina
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 22% · published 3.5
3.14
Colin Liebling
published 3.5
3.13
Shelly Jude
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.13
Tanya Barcinas
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.89
Susan Brogden
published
Jennifer Straughn
published
Katherine Barron
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephannie Messina + Sue Sheldon11954% games+5.0% vs expected
Tanya Barcinas + Suzanne Jeska3452% games−8.2% vs expected
Suzanne Jeska + Stephannie Messina11264% gamesnot enough data
Suzanne Jeska + Emily Starritt213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emily Starritt
205W–104L career · 6 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
3.5
J Yau
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Suzanne Jeska
170W–105L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Sue Sheldon
129W–66L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Stephannie Messina
122W–62L career · 8 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Colin Liebling
5W–0L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Shelly Jude
135W–162L career · 7 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Tanya Barcinas
206W–149L career · 5 lines in 2022
16%83%<1%
3.13
Susan Brogden
13W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
2.89
Jennifer Straughn
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Katherine Barron
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.