Teams

Flint River/Kim Thriffiley

2023 Flint River USTA Adult 18 & Over - Spring · Women 4.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.83 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-03-26Won 20
W#1 DoublesKim Thriffiley / Gina Herring vs Brandi Byce / Carson Parker3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRhonda Tullos / Lisa Franson vs Elizabeth Hardy / Cindy Anglin6-4, 6-1
2023-03-21Won 10
W#3 DoublesJulie Connell / Elaine Rudd vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-03-14vs Bainbridge/ThomasSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMorgan Scott / Michelle Eubanks vs Gina Bell / Amy Thomas6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKim Thriffiley / Gina Herring vs Rhonda Wells / April Helms3-6, 4-6
2023-03-06vs Camilla/AnglinSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMorgan Scott / Rhonda Tullos vs Nikki Hall / Brandi Byce6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKim Thriffiley / Elaine Rudd vs Carole Floyd / Joan Bassett4-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Michelle Eubanks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Lisa Franson
published
3.59
Rhonda Tullos
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.50
Kim Thriffiley
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Elaine Rudd
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Gina Herring
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rhonda Tullos + Gina Herring122545% games+7.1% vs expected
Elaine Rudd + Rhonda Tullos181448% games+3.1% vs expected
Elaine Rudd + Kim Thriffiley192748% games+0.2% vs expected
Kim Thriffiley + Gina Herring41642% gamesnot enough data
Kim Thriffiley + Rhonda Tullos31437% gamesnot enough data
Elaine Rudd + Gina Herring7850% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Eubanks + Gina Herring5551% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Eubanks + Rhonda Tullos5259% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Michelle Eubanks
157W–99L career · 1 line in 2023
13%87%1%
3.66
Lisa Franson
18W–17L career · no lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
3.60
4
Rhonda Tullos
237W–248L career · 4 lines in 2023
26%73%<1%
3.59
Kim Thriffiley
144W–202L career · 3 lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.50
Elaine Rudd
185W–162L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Gina Herring
212W–283L career · 4 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.