Teams

Hines 3.5 40 Spring

2026 Decatur Spring Adult 40 and Over 3.0 - 4.5 · 3.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-06vs Collis 3.5 40 SpringLost 03
L#1 DoublesAllen Hines / George Ho-Tung vs Stephen Crowell / Mike McCann3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesFrank Roberts / Kevin Capone vs Jamie Kelly / Scott Gillies6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChristopher Proctor / Josh Wisener vs Asa Pease / Perry Baker2-6, 1-6
2026-04-27vs Collis 3.5 40 SpringSplit 22
W#1 DoublesNeil Matson / Shannon Sutton vs Jamie Kelly / Mike McCann6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKevin Capone vs Chuck Lamar6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGeorge Ho-Tung / Frank Roberts vs Newell Johnson / Joseph Marks4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTroy Butler / Michael Gibson vs Jeff Griffis / Vu Pham6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2026-04-25vs Collis 3.5 40 SpringSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKevin Capone / Neil Matson vs Stephen Crowell / Andrew Plankenhorn7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJosh Wisener vs Asa Pease1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Gibson / Frank Roberts vs Jeff Griffis / Vu Pham5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesChristopher Proctor / Hill Rowan vs Kip Potter / Jason Seale7-5, 6-3
2026-04-19vs Collis 3.5 40 SpringLost 13
L#1 DoublesGeorge Ho-Tung / Michael Gibson vs Newell Johnson / Scott Gillies2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAllen Hines vs Asa Pease0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesShannon Sutton / Josh Wisener vs Kip Potter / Jeff Griffis2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristopher Proctor / Hill Rowan vs Chuck Lamar / Joseph Marks6-7, 1-6
2026-04-16vs Collis 3.5 40 SpringLost 04
L#1 DoublesShannon Sutton / George Ho-Tung vs David Collis / Stephen Crowell1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKevin Capone vs Asa Pease4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNeil Matson / Allen Hines vs Newell Johnson / Joseph Marks2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesEugene Acupan / Hill Rowan vs Kip Potter / Jeff Griffis6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2026-04-11vs Collis 3.5 40 SpringLost 04
L#1 DoublesNeil Matson / Frank Roberts vs Newell Johnson / Scott Gillies7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKevin Capone vs Asa Pease0-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAllen Hines / Michael Gibson vs Stephen Crowell / Andrew Plankenhorn1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJosh Wisener / Christopher Proctor vs Vu Pham / Karl King4-6, 6-7
2026-04-01vs Collis 3.5 40 SpringLost 03
L#1 DoublesGeorge Ho-Tung / Frank Roberts vs Newell Johnson / Stephen Crowell0-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesChristopher Proctor vs Asa Pease3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJosh Wisener / Troy Butler vs David Collis / Perry Baker1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Neil Matson
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.44
Kevin Capone
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.26
Hill Rowan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
George Ho-Tung
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.24
Josh Wisener
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.23
Allen Hines
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Shannon Sutton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Eugene Acupan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Frank Roberts
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.08
Christopher Proctor
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.91
Troy Butler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon Sutton + Kevin Capone4355% games+12.2% vs expected
George Ho-Tung + Frank Roberts1739% games−8.4% vs expected
Frank Roberts + Neil Matson2354% gamesnot enough data
Neil Matson + Kevin Capone4155% gamesnot enough data
George Ho-Tung + Allen Hines224 matchesnot enough data
Josh Wisener + Christopher Proctor224 matchesnot enough data
Shannon Sutton + Troy Butler123 matchesnot enough data
Shannon Sutton + Frank Roberts123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Neil Matson
93W–56L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.57
Kevin Capone
42W–29L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.44
Hill Rowan
9W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
George Ho-Tung
20W–26L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Josh Wisener
26W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Allen Hines
21W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Shannon Sutton
34W–28L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Eugene Acupan
16W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
Frank Roberts
23W–48L career · 8 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Christopher Proctor
47W–43L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.08
Troy Butler
54W–63L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%73%26%
2.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.