Teams

Racqueteers

2025 Prince Georges Adult 18 & Over · Prince Georges Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 2.83 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2025-06-21vs Blazing Dodgers 3.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJose Toro / Leonardo Balieiro vs Ali Hamdani / Chris Takiar0-6, 3-6
2025-06-14Won 10
W#3 DoublesJose Toro / Leonardo Balieiro vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-07vs Acers 3.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSean Helfrich / Greg Erdman vs Henry Jenkins / Greg Singh3-6, 2-6
2025-06-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesLeonardo Balieiro / Bahaa Ghammraoui vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-05-17vs Acers 3.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesSean Helfrich / Erol Dolen vs Issac Mance / Mario Walker6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2025-05-03Won 10
W#3 DoublesTaurean Branch / Leonardo Balieiro vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-27vs Acers 3.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesLeonardo Balieiro / Sean Helfrich vs Issac Mance / Mario Walker3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-26vs Acers 3.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSean Helfrich / Greg Erdman vs Mario Walker / Issac Mance6-7, 2-6
2025-04-19vs Acers 3.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTaurean Branch / Leonardo Balieiro vs Desmond LaMar / Greg Singh2-6, 2-6
2025-04-13vs Acers 3.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLeonardo Balieiro / Sean Helfrich vs Charlie JONES / Greg Singh0-6, 1-6
2025-04-12vs Acers 3.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesErol Dolen / Sean Helfrich vs Charlie JONES / Bill Keating1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesLeonardo Balieiro vs Greg Singh2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Prince Georges Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Taurean Branch
published
2.86
Ethan Jost
published
2.84
Daniel Volker
published 3
2.81
Leonardo Balieiro
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.56
Greg Erdman
published
2.55
Sean Helfrich
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Erol Dolen
published
Suho Shin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sean Helfrich + Leonardo Balieiro123 matchesnot enough data
Leonardo Balieiro + Daniel Volker123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Taurean Branch
12W–10L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Ethan Jost
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Daniel Volker
16W–21L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Leonardo Balieiro
38W–34L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Greg Erdman
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.56
2.5
Sean Helfrich
13W–26L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%37%63%
2.55
Erol Dolen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Suho Shin
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.