Teams

PW.Mueller

2022 CTRL Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Combo 40 & Over 6.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-10-06vs MD.RawlsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesMeg Mueller / Colleen Foy vs Jamie Middledorf / Brooke Rawls0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCurlee Petty / Karen Mason vs Jennifer Alviano / Lori Kemeny7-5, 6-3
2022-09-22vs PW.MladsiWon 10
W#2 DoublesMeg Mueller / Isabella Griffa vs Courtney Osman / Penny Kraft6-2, 6-0
2022-09-15vs PW.LibbyLost 01
L#2 DoublesMeg Mueller / Mary Ott vs Ellen Libby / Angie Powell2-6, 0-6
2022-09-08vs TOC.BarclaySplit 11
L#1 DoublesNancy McDonnell / Isabella Griffa vs Melyssa Kemp / Kathleen Murray1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMeg Mueller / Mary Sherman vs DeLana Anderson / Brenda Li7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2022-09-01vs TOC.SagerWon 10
W#2 DoublesMeg Mueller / Isabella Griffa vs Cheryl Morgenstein / Kim Hunt4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-08-23vs PW.EubanksLost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Mason / Isabella Griffa vs Julie Randle / Laura Toombs1-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 40 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Alexandra Burn
published 3.5
3.15
Isabella Griffa
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Mary Ott
published
2.80
Meg Mueller
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Curlee Petty
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.55
Nancy McDonnell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meg Mueller + Isabella Griffa6649% games−3.9% vs expected
Isabella Griffa + Curlee Petty123 matchesnot enough data
Mary Ott + Alexandra Burn213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alexandra Burn
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Isabella Griffa
53W–89L career · 4 lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.15
Mary Ott
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%26%74%
3.08
3
Meg Mueller
36W–52L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Curlee Petty
34W–56L career · 1 line in 2022
12%87%<1%
2.65
Nancy McDonnell
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
2.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.