Teams

CCV GREEN

2023 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 9.0 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 4.20 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-14vs SS-H GREENWon 10
W#3 DoublesJustin Eisner / Michele Cunningham vs Andrew Hamilton / Sarah Megilligan6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-05-08vs GTC NAVYWon 10
W#3 DoublesJustin Eisner / Kelly Cohen vs Paul Barrow / Tonya Laden6-3, 6-2
2023-04-30vs DTC BLUESplit 11
L#2 DoublesJames Jaggers / Michele Cunningham vs Michelle Miller / Brian Cox4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLinda Bartels / Jim Carpenter vs Bria Smith / Eric Snelgrove6-2, 7-5
2023-04-23vs APR-MH REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichele Cunningham / William Wall vs Peter Hanley / Mary Lopez6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLinda Bartels / Jim Carpenter vs Nicole Storatz / William Epping2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKelly Cohen / Sean Hudelson vs Emily Mone / Fetu Nuuvali6-0, 2-6, 1-0
2023-04-16vs DTP NAVYLost 01
L#3 DoublesLinda Bartels / Jim Carpenter vs Diana Solanki / Alberto Gutierrez7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2023-04-09vs SS-H GREENLost 01
L#3 DoublesKelly Cohen / Sean Hudelson vs Mindy Tabakin / Kenneth Kilgore2-6, 2-6
2023-04-02vs GTC NAVYLost 01
L#3 DoublesKelly Cohen / Sean Hudelson vs Michelle Degitis / W Hancock2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 9.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Kelly Cohen
published
4.31
James Jaggers
published
4.23
Michele Cunningham
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.10
Jim Carpenter
published
4.10
Justin Eisner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.95
Linda Bartels
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.85
Colleen Carlson
published 4
3.75
Sean Hudelson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
William Wall
published
Marcela Rascon
published
Rory Jaggers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michele Cunningham + Justin Eisner1832% gamesnot enough data
Sean Hudelson + Colleen Carlson044 matchesnot enough data
William Wall + Marcela Rascon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Cohen
8W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
4.43
James Jaggers
28W–19L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Michele Cunningham
72W–59L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
4.23
Jim Carpenter
12W–14L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
4.10
4.5
Justin Eisner
35W–55L career · 2 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
4.10
4
Linda Bartels
200W–79L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Colleen Carlson
13W–40L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.85
4
Sean Hudelson
53W–92L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
William Wall
9W–25L career · no lines in 2023
97%3%<1%
3.73
Marcela Rascon
8W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rory Jaggers
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.