Teams

KY/BG/HESTER

2026 USTA LEAGUE 18 & Over- BG · 4.0 MEN

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-05-27vs KY/BG/GILLOCKLost 13
L#1 DoublesAndy Staples / Hank Campbell vs Shahbaz Munawar / Chad Young6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJustin Hester / Evan Barnwell vs Charles Gillock / Cody Sheffield4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesBrent Mason vs Brad Hales0-1
W#3 DoublesBradley Jones / Jacob Latham vs Alex Downing / Trevor Sanders6-4, 6-4
2026-05-26vs KY/BG/GILLOCKLost 12
L#1 DoublesEvan Barnwell / Justin Hester vs Shahbaz Munawar / Cody Sheffield3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJames Almand / Jonathan Wood vs Chad Young / Charles Gillock7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesBradley Jones / Jacob Latham vs Alex Downing / Trevor Sanders6-7, 6-7
2026-05-16vs KY/BG/GILLOCKWon 21
W#1 DoublesJames Almand / Jonathan Wood vs Charles Gillock / Chad Young6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesChristopher Clarkson vs Brandon Sheffield2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBrayden Johnson / Jon Newton vs Shahbaz Munawar / Trevor Sanders6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brayden Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.96
Bradley Jones
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.96
Jonathan Wood
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Andy Staples
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Christopher Clarkson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.42
Brent Mason
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
James Almand
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Justin Hester
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Hank Campbell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Evan Barnwell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Jacob Latham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jon Newton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brayden Johnson
1W–0L career · type D · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4
Bradley Jones
14W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.96
Jonathan Wood
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Andy Staples
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4
Christopher Clarkson
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
3.5
Brent Mason
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
James Almand
2W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
3.39
Justin Hester
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Hank Campbell
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Evan Barnwell
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jacob Latham
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jon Newton
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.