← Teams

GFU-Rudinsky

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Andrea Hobi
published 3.5
3.39
Chris van Leeuwen
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.29
Patricia Eargle
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Kiersten Lake
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.18
Elizabeth Maguire
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Mary Rudinsky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Nancy Salisbury
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.96
Victoria Cartwright
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2022-06-11Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesChris van Leeuwen / Kiersten Lake vs Lupine Swanson / Jing Li6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Maguire vs Devrie Brennan6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNancy Salisbury / Patricia Eargle vs Rachel Nies / Jane King Ayers1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-06-10Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesKiersten Lake / Chris van Leeuwen vs Robin Welter / Kerri Patrick3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesVictoria Cartwright vs Jennifer Drew6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Salisbury / Elizabeth Maguire vs Anne Stein-Gray / Rhonda Baker7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMary Rudinsky / Patricia Eargle vs Lucila Griesser / Robyn Hilden2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-06-04Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesPatricia Eargle / Nancy Salisbury vs Dorothy Cofield / Lynn Brown6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Maguire vs Melinee Steck0-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChris van Leeuwen / Kiersten Lake vs Susan Sienko / Wendy Smith6-2, 6-1
2022-05-22Lost 1–3
W#1 DoublesChris van Leeuwen / Kiersten Lake vs Devrie Brennan / Ann-Marie Lundberg6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesVictoria Cartwright vs Rachel Connell6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Maguire / Nancy Salisbury vs Dipali Dixit / Jennifer Weaver1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPatricia Eargle / Mary Rudinsky vs Jing Li / Lupine Swanson6-1, 6-4
2022-05-21Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesNancy Salisbury / Elizabeth Maguire vs Mihee Park / Wanda Ng6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesVictoria Cartwright vs Ann Tu3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChris van Leeuwen / Kiersten Lake vs THAO VAN / Cynthia Ross-Brockett6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMary Rudinsky / Sharon Patricelli vs Megan Clifford / Theresa Hagerty6-3, 7-6
2022-05-14Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Maguire / Patricia Eargle vs Alena Lauritsen / Dayna Jahnke-Corwin3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesVictoria Cartwright vs Emily Qi6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMary Rudinsky / Sharon Patricelli vs Jennifer Thompson / Julie Dicks6-4, 7-5
2022-05-13Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesKiersten Lake / Chris van Leeuwen vs Kusum Mehndiratta / Susan Elmer7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesVictoria Cartwright vs April Mayers6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Maguire / Nancy Salisbury vs Kimbra Kasch / Tammy Russum6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPatricia Eargle / Mary Rudinsky vs Ann Hays / Jeannette Martinez6-2, 6-2
2022-05-01Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesKiersten Lake / Chris van Leeuwen vs Tiffany Bowie / Lynn Brown6-2, 7-5
L#1 SinglesVictoria Cartwright vs Christy MacColl6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Maguire / Nancy Salisbury vs Dorothy Cofield / Sally Papadimas6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Andrea Hobi
63W–46L career
0%92%8%
3.44
3.5
Chris van Leeuwen
90W–38L career
0%93%7%
3.39
3.5
Patricia Eargle
64W–51L career
1%98%1%
3.29
3.5
Kiersten Lake
75W–60L career
1%98%1%
3.26
3.5
Elizabeth Maguire
78W–42L career
5%95%0%
3.18
3.5
Mary Rudinsky
50W–42L career
18%82%0%
3.08
3
Nancy Salisbury
58W–46L career
0%82%18%
2.98
3
Victoria Cartwright
58W–80L career
0%83%17%
2.96

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.