Teams

V - Arroyo Vista Match Makers

2023 USTA Adult 40 &Over - Ventura WD · V - Women 4.0 WD

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-03-16vs V - Ojai Let-Love-WinLost 01
L#1 DoublesJane Clancy / Barbara Heitman vs Daisy Carlson / Joy Henning0-6, 5-7
2023-03-08vs V - Las Posas Run for ItLost 01
L#3 DoublesBarbara Heitman / Crystal Kallik vs Mary Johnson / Tera Williams6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2023-02-13vs V - SherwoodLost 01
L#1 DoublesMindy Czubiak / Barbara Heitman vs Alice Palermo / Corrine Weiner4-6, 4-6
2023-02-10vs V - WAC Ace KickersLost 01
L#1 DoublesJane Clancy / Barbara Heitman vs Alisha Shohet / Alona Kavinoky2-6, 4-6
2023-01-18vs V - Mission Oaks Hit and RunLost 01
L#2 DoublesJami Shane / Mindy Czubiak vs Mariana Sullivan / Lillian Stewart2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for V - Women 4.0 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Darcy Antonellis
published 4
3.63
Jami Shane
published
3.56
Tracee Nilsson
published 4
3.40
Sophia McCreary
published
3.36
Lynne F Krueger
published
3.35
Mindy Czubiak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.31
Barbara Heitman
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.31
Denise Peak
published 3.5
3.15
Eda Rousselet
published 3.5
3.14
Kelly Deardorff
published
2.83
Hope Jones
published
Patricia Mueller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Heitman + Tracee Nilsson61446% gamesnot enough data
Mindy Czubiak + Barbara Heitman21138% gamesnot enough data
Mindy Czubiak + Tracee Nilsson1441% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Darcy Antonellis
17W–10L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Jami Shane
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.63
4
Tracee Nilsson
52W–89L career · type A · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.56
Sophia McCreary
4W–14L career · no lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
3.40
Lynne F Krueger
13W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.36
4
Mindy Czubiak
36W–73L career · 2 lines in 2023
86%14%<1%
3.35
3.5
Barbara Heitman
133W–149L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Denise Peak
11W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Eda Rousselet
18W–56L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.15
Kelly Deardorff
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.14
Hope Jones
3W–20L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
Patricia Mueller
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.