Teams

Rinaldi

2021 Tri-Level Metro · 4.0 Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.58 / METROPOLITAN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-03-09vs GonzalezWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrian Silvestry / Isaac Halpern vs Chris Martinetti / Salvador Mikel3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNate Ziller / Thomas Rinaldi vs Kevin Gonzalez / Amish Jhaveri6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesReid Goodman / Ken Harmon vs Jeffrey Mitnick / Vladimir Parizhsky3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-02-28vs McInnisLost 12
W#1 DoublesBrian Silvestry / Casey Ryan vs Jean Telfort / Tongkun Liu6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRon Cohen / Roberto Torres vs Theron McInnis / Chadrick Hamilton4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesReid Goodman / William Xiang vs Jonathan Piccirillo / Jeffrey Lacy2-6, 3-6
2021-02-22vs Metro: Bhagwagar/LeeLost 02
L#1 DoublesIsaac Halpern / Casey Ryan vs Damian Zunino / Horatio Wildman6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRon Cohen / HENRI van EEGHEN vs Vineet Ahuja / Raymond Borno4-6, 5-7
2021-02-17vs ChoySplit 11
L#2 DoublesJesse Galvan / Thomas Rinaldi vs Alvin Choy / Jeff Rea3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesReid Goodman / William Xiang vs William Mazurek / Justin Ladzinski6-1, 6-0
2021-02-04vs GonzalezWon 30
W#1 DoublesHENRI van EEGHEN / Casey Ryan vs Vidur Mittal / Salvador Mikel7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRon Cohen / Roberto Torres vs Amish Jhaveri / Kevin Gonzalez6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesReid Goodman / William Xiang vs Vladimir Parizhsky / Greg Hunt6-4, 6-1
2021-01-28vs McInnisLost 12
L#1 DoublesNate Ziller / Brian Silvestry vs Jean Telfort / Roydon Coddett2-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRon Cohen / HENRI van EEGHEN vs Theron McInnis / David Ng6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesHarry Figgie / Hendrick Colbert vs Jonathan Piccirillo / Chadrick Hamilton1-6, 0-6
2021-01-22vs Metro: Bhagwagar/LeeLost 12
W#1 DoublesNate Ziller / Casey Ryan vs Nishad Deshpande / Jatin Rajput6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRoberto Torres / Thomas Rinaldi vs Koray Yilmaz / Raymond Borno2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKen Harmon / Reid Goodman vs Nikhil Mehra / Yuanbin Wang2-6, 1-6
2021-01-13vs ChoyWon 10
W#2 DoublesNate Ziller / Rajmohan Mohanan vs Jeff Rea / Raymond Cho6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Julian Yarmouth
published
Brian Silvestry
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Casey Ryan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.39
William Xiang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Thomas Rinaldi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Isaac Halpern
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Hendrick Colbert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Roberto Torres
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Rajmohan Mohanan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.95
Ron Cohen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Harry Figgie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.58
Reid Goodman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
HENRI van EEGHEN
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Ken Harmon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nate Ziller
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Isaac Halpern + Brian Silvestry2348% games−0.5% vs expected
Thomas Rinaldi + Ron Cohen303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julian Yarmouth
66W–48L career · no lines in 2021
79%21%<1%
3.89
4
Brian Silvestry
50W–56L career · 9 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Casey Ryan
32W–19L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
William Xiang
29W–14L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%79%21%
3.39
Thomas Rinaldi
115W–106L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Isaac Halpern
60W–93L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Hendrick Colbert
7W–19L career · type S · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Roberto Torres
8W–26L career · 3 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Rajmohan Mohanan
22W–48L career · 1 line in 2021
32%68%<1%
3.06
Ron Cohen
56W–120L career · 4 lines in 2021
65%35%<1%
2.95
3
Harry Figgie
5W–17L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Reid Goodman
8W–12L career · 4 lines in 2021
28%72%<1%
2.58
HENRI van EEGHEN
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Ken Harmon
3W–13L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Nate Ziller
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.