Teams

The Villages Copeland

2024 Marion Combo 50 & Over · 50 & Over 7.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-07vs Marion/Centonze/50&Over7.5WLost 01
L#3 DoublesMelanie Turner / Terry Sturm vs Beth Riendeau / Sharon Christie Ybanez0-6, 3-6
2024-11-24vs The Villages Aces (Perkins/Plante)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesHera Peterson / Melanie Turner vs Mylan Barfield / Terri DeMartino3-6, 0-6
2024-11-10vs SKY SpinaWon 10
W#3 DoublesMelanie Turner / Terry Sturm vs Suzanne Busk / Henny David6-1, 6-3
2024-10-27vs Marion/Centonze/50&Over7.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesTerry Sturm / Robin Zink vs Debby Watts / Susan Atwell2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHera Peterson / Melanie Turner vs Pamela Plumlee / Kathy Hatfield4-6, 2-6
2024-10-20vs The Villages Aces (Perkins/Plante)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTerry Sturm / Melanie Turner vs Valerie Elvin / Ellen Berosh6-7, 3-6
2024-09-29vs FK WalshLost 01
L#2 DoublesMelanie Turner / Terry Sturm vs Marianne Marcoux / Natalie Petsche1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 50 & Over 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Judy Hoops
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Ann-Marie Chouinard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Diane Josselyn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Lisa Lee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Terry Sturm
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Robin Zink
published
3.04
Maricel Keiter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Kim Arcobello
published
2.93
Melanie Turner
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Elizabeth Bosco
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Hera Peterson
published
Margaret Mis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terry Sturm + Melanie Turner162647% games−3.2% vs expected
Judy Hoops + Ann-Marie Chouinard8554% games−4.2% vs expected
Margaret Mis + Lisa Lee123 matchesnot enough data
Judy Hoops + Elizabeth Bosco213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Judy Hoops
16W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
Ann-Marie Chouinard
10W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Diane Josselyn
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Lee
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Terry Sturm
34W–41L career · 9 lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
Robin Zink
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
Maricel Keiter
5W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.04
Kim Arcobello
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
2.98
Melanie Turner
40W–53L career · 10 lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
2.93
Elizabeth Bosco
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Hera Peterson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Margaret Mis
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Virginia Coulter-Heindl
9W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.