Teams

4 Avalon Giacchi

2023 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.07 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-06-24vs 1 Westwood CarlinWon 10
W#1 SinglesSteven Edlavitch vs Brian Holder6-3, 6-2
2023-06-11vs 5 Willow Oaks Bressler GentlemenWon 10
W#1 DoublesSteven Edlavitch / Jeremy Berteele vs George Sibley / Ryan Frei4-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Chris Giacchi
published 3.5
3.49
Steven Edlavitch
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Todd Milligan
published
3.08
Jeremy Berteele
published
3.02
Kristopher Johnson
published
2.89
Joseph Piwowarski
published
2.88
Rob Henley
published
2.76
Ford Sleeman
published 3
2.72
Brian Hellenga
published 3
2.66
John Sentz
published
2.65
John Bates
published
2.62
Chris Haberlin
published 3
2.40
Ian Watt
published 3
2.27
Eric Zimmerman
published 2.5
Meir Amar
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joseph Piwowarski + Ford Sleeman2351% games−9.7% vs expected
John Bates + Jeremy Berteele134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chris Giacchi
18W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
3.57
3.5
Steven Edlavitch
122W–71L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
Todd Milligan
18W–7L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
Jeremy Berteele
24W–25L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
Kristopher Johnson
17W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.02
Joseph Piwowarski
13W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.89
Rob Henley
10W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Ford Sleeman
11W–17L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Brian Hellenga
10W–19L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
2.72
John Sentz
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
2.66
John Bates
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%<1%
2.65
3
Chris Haberlin
8W–13L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
2.62
3
Ian Watt
3W–12L career · no lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
2.40
2.5
Eric Zimmerman
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
0%96%4%
2.27
Meir Amar
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.