Teams

Greenway

2026 CVTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Spring · Women 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.30 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings2 teams · Women 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CVTA/Lori Patch24141636283
2Greenway1572348326

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Tara McFarlane
published
3.37
Hannah Laury
published 3.5
3.25
Carla Swinford
published 3.5
3.18
Sket Angland
published
3.15
Lesa Dixon
published
3.13
Melissa Touchstone
published
3.13
Michelle Arp
published
3.05
Dawn Wright
published 3.5
2.77
Brooke Greenway
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.67
Mary Andersen
published
2.63
Angela Evans
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Minerva Dano
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brooke Greenway + Lesa Dixon4744% games+3.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tara McFarlane
67W–97L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Hannah Laury
25W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Carla Swinford
17W–22L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
Sket Angland
32W–38L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
Lesa Dixon
18W–25L career · no lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.15
Melissa Touchstone
7W–8L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.13
Michelle Arp
33W–21L career · no lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
3.13
3.5
Dawn Wright
6W–11L career · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Brooke Greenway
32W–43L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
Mary Andersen
3W–18L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Angela Evans
20W–40L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
2.63
Minerva Dano
7W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.