Teams

ETC:Deuce Divas:Lopez

2025 WMA Adult 18 & Over Women · 2.5 Women 1

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-10-06vs ETC:Honey Deuces :Garska/SignetLost 12
L#1 DoublesTraci Leary / Hope Walsh vs Tara Garstka / Cheryl Signet7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRitika Bhatt vs Aimee Leventis5-7, 5-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRashel Girshik / Michelle Szlajen vs Samantha Root / Toni Wall6-1, 6-2
2024-09-15vs ETC:Honey Deuces :Garska/SignetWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichelle Szlajen / Rashel Girshik vs Udaya Jagadeesan / Toni Wall6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesRitika Bhatt vs Tara Garstka1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMartha Lopez / Hope Walsh vs Rani AThreya / Kristina Mentuck6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.40 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.75
Alexandra Yevsyuk
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.69
Martha Lopez
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.51
Rashel Girshik
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.46
Michelle Szlajen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.29
Hope Walsh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.29
Jennifer Crean
published
2.17
Traci Leary
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.05
Julia Glybin
published
Julie Bugeau
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ritika Bhatt
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Szlajen + Rashel Girshik15860% games+6.6% vs expected
Traci Leary + Hope Walsh213 matchesnot enough data
Alexandra Yevsyuk + Rashel Girshik213 matchesnot enough data
Alexandra Yevsyuk + Martha Lopez303 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Szlajen + Hope Walsh213 matchesnot enough data
Rashel Girshik + Hope Walsh213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alexandra Yevsyuk
23W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Martha Lopez
29W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Rashel Girshik
27W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%46%54%
2.51
Michelle Szlajen
30W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%63%37%
2.46
Hope Walsh
17W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.29
Jennifer Crean
20W–33L career · no lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.29
Traci Leary
12W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
Julia Glybin
4W–13L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Julie Bugeau
10W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ritika Bhatt
10W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.