Teams

8 Avalon Calhoun Overserved

2022 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.40 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-05-29vs 13 LPC PolitowiczWon 10
W#1 DoublesGabriel Ghita / Ian Shupack vs Chris Mooz / Chuck Wandling6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-05-22vs 18 MTC Resurgence 3.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRadu Siminiceanu / Gabriel Ghita vs Greg Deeb / Andrew Bolyard6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2022-05-22vs 11 Ridgetop GivenWon 10
W#1 DoublesRobert Calhoun / Gabriel Ghita vs Jeff Given / Clem Ulrichs6-3, 7-5
2022-05-15vs 10 Woodlake McCoyLost 01
L#1 DoublesGabriel Ghita / Jesse Pasco vs Brian Elliott / Dave McCoy1-6, 2-6
2022-04-03vs 14 Woodlake Patterson 3.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesGabriel Ghita / Jason Hetherington vs Steve Costantino / Doug Garrett6-2, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Robert Calhoun
published
3.49
Jesse Pasco
published
3.41
Ian Shupack
published 3.5
3.31
George Brickley
published 3.5
3.30
Gabriel Ghita
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.26
Guillermo Pardo
published 3.5
3.19
Tim Dolan
published
3.15
Jason Hetherington
published
3.09
John French
published
3.03
Mark Schultz
published
2.91
Darrell Jervey
published 3
2.60
Scott Schoenborn
published
Mahood Fonville
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gabriel Ghita + Robert Calhoun7163% games+4.9% vs expected
Jesse Pasco + Robert Calhoun7257% games+1.3% vs expected
Jesse Pasco + Guillermo Pardo4362% gamesnot enough data
John French + Mark Schultz213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Calhoun
28W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%44%56%
3.52
Jesse Pasco
22W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Ian Shupack
14W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
George Brickley
13W–20L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Gabriel Ghita
137W–80L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Guillermo Pardo
9W–13L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
Tim Dolan
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Jason Hetherington
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.15
John French
13W–14L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
Mark Schultz
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Darrell Jervey
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
2.91
Scott Schoenborn
0W–10L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
2.60
Mahood Fonville
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.