Teams

Wallace 40s 4.0M Singles Tues PM

2026 Piedmont Singles 40+ · 4.0 Men Singles Tues

4 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-21vs Davis 40s 4.0M Singles Tues PMLost 12
W#1 SinglesEric Lustig vs Tony McGraw4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesScott Wallace vs Ranganadh Vemuri0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesRichard Fabiano vs Corey Davis1-6, 2-6
2026-07-15vs Davis 40s 4.0M Singles Tues PMLost 12
L#1 SinglesEric Lustig vs Ranganadh Vemuri0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesScott Wallace vs Tony McGraw1-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesRichard Fabiano vs Huy Ho7-5, 6-3
2026-07-11vs Davis 40s 4.0M Singles Tues PMLost 03
L#1 SinglesEric Lustig vs Brad Green1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesScott Wallace vs Scot Harrison4-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesRichard Fabiano vs Ranganadh Vemuri0-6, 1-6
2026-07-07vs Davis 40s 4.0M Singles Tues PMLost 03
L#1 SinglesEric Lustig vs John Kim3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesScott Wallace vs Ranganadh Vemuri3-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesRichard Fabiano vs Scot Harrison0-6, 5-7
2026-07-06vs Davis 40s 4.0M Singles Tues PMLost 03
L#1 SinglesScott Wallace vs Corey Davis3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesEric Lustig vs Ranganadh Vemuri0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesRichard Fabiano vs Scot Harrison1-6, 1-6
2026-06-26vs Davis 40s 4.0M Singles Tues PMLost 02
L#1 SinglesEric Lustig vs Corey Davis7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesRichard Fabiano vs John Kim6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-06-09vs Davis 40s 4.0M Singles Tues PMLost 12
L#1 SinglesEric Lustig vs Scot Harrison5-7, 2-6
W#2 SinglesScott Wallace vs Huy Ho6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 SinglesRichard Fabiano vs Tony McGraw0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Men Singles Tues
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Davis 40s 4.0M Singles Tues PM8020410114
2Wallace 40s 4.0M Singles Tues PM0842042266

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Chris Leggette
published 4
3.61
Eric Lustig
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Singles 14% · published
3.46
Scott Wallace
usually #2 Singles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
3.27
Richard Fabiano
usually #3 Singles 86%, also #2 Singles 14% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chris Leggette
18W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.92
Eric Lustig
9W–24L career · 7 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.61
Scott Wallace
15W–32L career · 6 lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
3.46
Richard Fabiano
11W–10L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.