Teams

Fee - Acquaviva

2023 Brevard Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.17 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-08vs Ttc - SimmonsLost 01
L#1 DoublesSantana Luis / Steven Lindsley vs Elliott Hogans / Isidro Zavaleta1-6, 3-6
2023-03-01vs Kiwi - DulayLost 01
L#1 DoublesSteven Lindsley / Santana Luis vs Ron Dulay / Martin Rojas0-6, 3-6
2023-02-22vs Brevard/Donovan/40&Over3.5MLost 01
L#1 DoublesKevin Landress / Santana Luis vs Shawn Coleman / Jay Amburgey3-6, 2-6
2023-02-15vs Ttc - SimmonsLost 01
L#1 DoublesSteven Lindsley / Santana Luis vs Elliott Hogans / Vincent Vo1-6, 3-6
2023-02-08vs Kiwi - DulayLost 01
L#2 DoublesMark Klenck / Santana Luis vs Bill Jordan / Sean Kelly3-6, 2-6
2023-01-25vs Ttc - SimmonsWon 10
W#1 DoublesSteven Lindsley / Santana Luis vs Jamell Caswell / Elliott Hogans7-5, 6-2
2023-01-18vs Kiwi - DulayLost 01
L#1 DoublesSantana Luis / Steven Lindsley vs Amer Mohamad / Chad Shoultz3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-01-11vs Brevard/Donovan/40&Over3.5MLost 01
L#2 DoublesSteven Lindsley / Santana Luis vs Zach Dahl / Shawn Coleman2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Santana Luis
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Ruben Diaz
published
3.09
Mark Klenck
published
3.06
Kevin Landress
published
2.94
Marcus Lumpkin
published
2.86
Jim Tulloch
published
2.85
Carl Acquaviva
published 3
2.45
Jay Riffe
published
2.40
David Parsons
published 3
Juan Restrepo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marcus Lumpkin + Mark Klenck213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Santana Luis
77W–80L career · 8 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Ruben Diaz
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.10
Mark Klenck
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%27%73%
3.09
Kevin Landress
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.06
Marcus Lumpkin
8W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
2.94
Jim Tulloch
14W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Carl Acquaviva
22W–20L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
2.85
Jay Riffe
6W–19L career · no lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
2.45
3
David Parsons
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
2.40
Juan Restrepo
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.