Teams

ALACHUA/Molyneux/Ratliff/Women/8.5

2022 Alachua Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-12-07vs JTC - PorterWon 20
W#1 DoublesNancy Embree / Debbie McMillan vs Lynn Godwin / Cynthia Thibault6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKelly Banes / Ekanong van Roy vs Lenhs Louis / Jordan Davis6-3, 6-2
2022-11-21vs JTC - PorterWon 20
W#2 DoublesKelly Banes / Nikki Perrino vs Anne Billion / Lenhs Louis6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEmily Dace / Ekanong van Roy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-11-17vs JTC - PorterWon 20
W#1 DoublesKelly Banes / Emily Dace vs Jordan Davis / Cynthia Thibault6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNikki Perrino / Haile Ratliff vs Kristina Ford / Jackie Sirmopoulos6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-10-29vs JTC - PorterWon 20
W#2 DoublesKelly Banes / Jami Nordenstam vs Cynthia Thibault / Jackie Sirmopoulos6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesEkanong van Roy / Emily Dace vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-10-15vs JTC - PorterWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Dace / Ekanong van Roy vs Katherine Evans / Cynthia Thibault6-4, 6-2
2022-10-06vs JTC - PorterWon 20
W#2 DoublesJami Nordenstam / Kelly Banes vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDebbie McMillan / Nancy Embree vs Jordan Davis / Jamie Primosch5-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.17 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Kelly Banes
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.37
Nikki Perrino
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.35
Emily Dace
published 4.5
Ekanong van Roy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Jami Nordenstam
published 4.5
3.57
Nancy Embree
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Olga Nin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Banes + Ekanong van Roy5161% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Banes + Nancy Embree314 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Banes + Emily Dace314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kelly Banes
136W–60L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
4.37
4.5
Nikki Perrino
57W–28L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
4.37
4.5
Emily Dace
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
4.35
4.5
Ekanong van Roy
92W–63L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Jami Nordenstam
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Embree
63W–33L career · 2 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
Olga Nin
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.