Teams

LCTA18/Meloeny/LTPDI

LCTA 18 & Over Fall League · 18 & over Fall League Women 3.0 Day

12 players · average NTRP 2.83 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18 & over Fall League Women 3.0 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Allison Dong
published 3
2.88
Ruth Meloeny
published
2.71
Nickole Branch
published
2.70
Lisa Leone
published
2.67
Jenna Wright
published
2.66
Melinda Zegas
published
2.65
Melody Walker
published
2.65
Sarah Pryor
published
2.62
2.61
Kelley Murray
published
2.33
Ashli Burns
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.24
Sarah Vernon
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ruth Meloeny + Allison Dong6071% games+14.1% vs expected
Melody Walker + Lisa Leone142045% games−3.9% vs expected
Kelley Murray + Jenna Wright3354% gamesnot enough data
Nickole Branch + Melinda Zegas224 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Leone + Kelley Murray303 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Leone + Nickole Branch213 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Leone + Allison Dong303 matchesnot enough data
Ruth Meloeny + Jenna Wright123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Allison Dong
41W–17L career · no lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.06
Ruth Meloeny
66W–66L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
Nickole Branch
15W–22L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Lisa Leone
29W–42L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
Jenna Wright
8W–19L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Melinda Zegas
60W–62L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
Melody Walker
22W–27L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
Sarah Pryor
29W–41L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Angie Shelton Moody
26W–31L career · no lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
2.62
Kelley Murray
30W–60L career · no lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.61
2.5
Ashli Burns
28W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.33
Sarah Vernon
21W–29L career · 1 line in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.