Teams

WS - Brady

2024 Alachua Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-04-07vs WS - LaiWon 10
W#2 DoublesRay Brady / Scott Lamp vs Muhammad Ali / Lawrence Hooghuis6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2024-04-02vs WS - LaiLost 01
L#1 DoublesGeorge Cockey / Erik Bredfeldt vs Song Lai / Bo Zhao2-6, 3-6
2024-03-17vs Alachua/Pu/55&Over7.0MLost 01
L#1 DoublesPaul Askew / Ray Brady vs Kevin Smith / Ed Stark2-6, 2-6
2024-03-10vs WS - LaiWon 20
W#2 DoublesHank Dudding / Malcolm Maden vs Lawrence Hooghuis / Ted Gingrich7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesGeorge Cockey / Richard Wright vs Jixiu Shan / Gregg Fissenden6-4, 6-3
2024-02-25vs Alachua/Pu/55&Over7.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesErik Bredfeldt / George Cockey vs Ed Stark / Malcolm H Waldron III5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPaul Askew / Ray Brady vs Jorg Bungert / Jerry Lu5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMalcolm Maden / Richard Wright vs Sorin Fratila / Paul Folkers0-6, 3-6
2024-02-21vs WS - LaiWon 10
W#2 DoublesPaul Askew / Ray Brady vs Lawrence Hooghuis / Gregg Fissenden6-1, 6-3
2024-02-06vs Alachua/Pu/55&Over7.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesErik Bredfeldt / George Cockey vs Tedd Comerford / Paul Folkers6-3, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMalcolm Maden / Richard Wright vs Kevin Athearn / HEE-SUNG BAE2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Asoo Vakharia
published 3.5
3.21
Paul Askew
published
3.15
Hank Dudding
published 3.5
3.14
Jack Jacobs
published 3.5
2.99
Ray Brady
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.81
George Cockey
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Malcolm Maden
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Richard Wright
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

George Cockey + Malcolm Maden0923% gamesnot enough data
Ray Brady + George Cockey1440% gamesnot enough data
Ray Brady + Malcolm Maden0518% gamesnot enough data
Paul Askew + Asoo Vakharia213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Asoo Vakharia
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.39
Paul Askew
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Hank Dudding
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Jack Jacobs
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%<1%
3.14
Ray Brady
31W–74L career · 4 lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
George Cockey
17W–71L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%92%8%
2.81
Malcolm Maden
34W–94L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Richard Wright
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.