Teams

Andrea Keller

2024 Virginia Beach Singles · Virginia Beach Singles 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-18Lost 01
L#3 SinglesErin Camden vs Anne Tew1-6, 0-6
2024-11-11vs NewtonLost 12
L#1 SinglesTina Grohowski vs Julie Soriano2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesTiffany Curran vs Marcela Anongos3-6, 6-7
W#3 SinglesAndrea Keller vs Grace Doss6-3, 6-2
2024-10-22vs NewtonWon 10
W#3 SinglesErin Camden vs Grace Doss6-0
2024-10-07vs SarconeLost 12
W#1 SinglesKatie LeGrande vs Jean Kemp6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesMegan Farr vs Anne Tew3-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesTiffany Curran vs Kelsey Sarcone4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Virginia Beach Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Katie LeGrande
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.43
Megan Farr
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.37
Paige Caporicci
published
3.35
Erin Camden
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.86
Andrea Keller
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Tiffany Curran
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Tina Grohowski
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Megan Farr + Erin Camden134 matchesnot enough data
Paige Caporicci + Megan Farr303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie LeGrande
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.60
Megan Farr
23W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.43
Paige Caporicci
11W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Erin Camden
141W–91L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%87%12%
3.35
3
Andrea Keller
10W–17L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%85%14%
2.86
Tiffany Curran
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tina Grohowski
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.