Teams

Ray 4.0 18s Tues

2023 Piedmont USTA 18 & Over · WOMEN 4.0 18 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-05-09vs Majestic 4.0 18s TuesWon 10
W#1 DoublesSarah Stafford / Amy Beth Kessinger vs Carrie Ganim / Christina Rush6-4, 6-4
2023-04-18Won 10
W#3 DoublesAmy Beth Kessinger / Sally Eagleton vs Melissa Baker / Karen Olson6-0, 6-0
2023-03-28vs Majestic 4.0 18s TuesWon 10
W#1 SinglesAmy Beth Kessinger vs Carol Schuck Dillon6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Amy Beth Kessinger
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4.5
3.95
Sally Eagleton
published
3.91
Kristin Williamson
published
3.83
Cari Powell
published 4
3.72
Kara Ray
published
3.55
Lisa Andree
published
3.53
Kimberly Franz
published
3.50
Gina Goy
published
3.41
3.41
Judiann Georgevich
published
3.08
Paula Gebhard
published
Joan Sloyan
published
Sarah Stafford
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chetana Honnarayanahalli + Gina Goy41142% games+3.9% vs expected
Chetana Honnarayanahalli + Judiann Georgevich5159% games+2.2% vs expected
Chetana Honnarayanahalli + Kristin Williamson5257% gamesnot enough data
Kara Ray + Cari Powell314 matchesnot enough data
Cari Powell + Judiann Georgevich314 matchesnot enough data
Gina Goy + Judiann Georgevich314 matchesnot enough data
Cari Powell + Gina Goy123 matchesnot enough data
Gina Goy + Sally Eagleton123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amy Beth Kessinger
82W–40L career · 5 lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
4.07
Sally Eagleton
20W–10L career · no lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
3.95
Kristin Williamson
40W–35L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.91
4
Cari Powell
34W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83
Kara Ray
17W–9L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Lisa Andree
24W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%37%63%
3.55
Kimberly Franz
41W–25L career · no lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.53
Gina Goy
33W–35L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.50
4
Chetana Honnarayanahalli
30W–30L career · type A · no lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
3.42
Gwen Highsmith-Quick
4W–17L career · no lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
3.41
Judiann Georgevich
35W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%25%
3.41
Paula Gebhard
11W–14L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
Joan Sloyan
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sarah Stafford
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.