Teams

RP: DePalma/Tucci

2024 RI TRI Level · 4.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.75 / RHODE ISLAND

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-11-23vs WB: Simonini/FreitasLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Depalma / Ashley L'Europa vs Lauren Freitas / Jessica Marfeo1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-11-10vs WB: Simonini/FreitasLost 01
L#1 DoublesCia Tucci / Jennifer Depalma vs Jessica Marfeo / Lisa Vinacco2-6, 5-7
2024-11-03vs HOF: Undergrads/FitzGerald/ConlonLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Gries / Talia Parenti vs Tiffany Conlon / Jaime Fastino2-5
2024-10-23vs RP: DiStefanoLost 01
L#1 DoublesCia Tucci / Sonja Marcheselli vs Julia Bush / Hilary Fagan3-6, 1-6
2024-10-19vs FC: Mangiaratti/FontesLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Gries / Talia Parenti vs Christine Deacon / Melanie Atwood5-7, 3-6
2024-10-06vs RP: DiStefanoLost 01
L#1 DoublesSonja Marcheselli / Jennifer Depalma vs Julia Bush / Hilary Fagan0-6, 2-6
2024-09-22vs HOF: Undergrads/FitzGerald/ConlonWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Depalma / Ashley L'Europa vs Glenna Johnson / Nicole FitzGerald5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-09-20vs FC: Mangiaratti/FontesLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Gries / Cia Tucci vs Olivia Sweeney / Kathryn Mangiaratti2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RP: Werchadlo0761560
2HOF: Zizza0752659
3HOF Rally Hackers/Gradley/Aldazabul07161270
4RP: DiStefano0880040
5WB: Simonini/Freitas0862656
6HOF: Undergrads/FitzGerald/Conlon08351177
7FC: Mangiaratti/Fontes08261281
8CC: Pippitt08351386
9RP: DePalma/Tucci08171597

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Sonja Marcheselli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ashley L'Europa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Michelle Gries
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Jennifer Depalma
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Cia Tucci
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Talia Parenti
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cia Tucci + Jennifer Depalma1642% games+5.0% vs expected
Ashley L'Europa + Jennifer Depalma10554% games+1.9% vs expected
Talia Parenti + Ashley L'Europa8353% games−9.7% vs expected
Cia Tucci + Michelle Gries044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sonja Marcheselli
77W–32L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Ashley L'Europa
44W–24L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Michelle Gries
102W–52L career · 5 lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.63
Jennifer Depalma
116W–114L career · 12 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Cia Tucci
98W–123L career · 5 lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
2.99
Talia Parenti
54W–43L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.