Teams

RPM

2023 Montgomery Adult 18 & Over Spring · Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-14vs SOHLost 01
L#2 DoublesKC Song / Boming Zhang vs Robert Kim / Jin Soh5-7, 0-6
2023-06-06vs Hit MenLost 01
L#3 DoublesJunyi Shi / Hyun Soo Kim vs Brian Krantz / Tony Ryan2-6, 3-6
2023-06-03vs I'd Hit That 18+ 3.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJunyi Shi / Mark Tyler vs Christopher Grant / Isaac Kuznits2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesEddie Gao / Boming Zhang vs Bill Hartman / Richard McKeon5-7, 3-6
2023-05-12vs SOHLost 02
L#2 DoublesDave Kim / Junyi Shi vs Jeeho Lee / Paul Song6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesXiao Liu / Boming Zhang vs Jin Soh / Bryan Bassig3-6, 1-6
2023-04-28vs I'd Hit That 18+ 3.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJunyi Shi / Zhiwei Lin vs Surendra Babu / Matt Baumann6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2023-04-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesZhiwei Lin / Junyi Shi vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
George Liu
published 4
3.60
Zhiwei Lin
published
3.35
Jun Hee Kim
published
3.32
Junyi Shi
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.24
Xiao Liu
published
3.16
Mark Tyler
published
3.03
Boming Zhang
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.92
Woo Jin Shim
published
2.90
Bo Liang
published 3
2.75
Hyun Soo Kim
published 3
2.69
Eddie Gao
published 3
KC Song
published
Ping-Jung Liu
published
ShiMing Chen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eddie Gao + Bo Liang224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
George Liu
13W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
4.03
Zhiwei Lin
10W–8L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.60
Jun Hee Kim
12W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Junyi Shi
54W–32L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.32
Xiao Liu
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
Mark Tyler
26W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%12%88%
3.16
3
Boming Zhang
19W–23L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.03
Woo Jin Shim
1W–9L career · no lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
2.92
3
Bo Liang
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Hyun Soo Kim
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
2.75
3
Eddie Gao
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69
KC Song
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ping-Jung Liu
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
ShiMing Chen
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.