Teams

Lady Love

2025 18&Over Women · 3.0

22 players · average NTRP 3.07 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-08vs Eastern/Choi/18&Over3.0WLost 05
L#1 DoublesLulu Cheng / Jing Li vs Gaohn Lee / Boyoun Kim6-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesJulia Eisenberg vs Violette de Bartillat2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNatasha Aronberg / Audrey Gabel vs Sool Park / Iris Lee2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesYelena Pyatski vs Irene Lee4-6, 2-2
L#3 DoublesDiane Vero / Jennifer Spangenthal vs Janna Kersting / Minhyeong Kim1-6, 4-6
2025-06-26vs Eastern/Choi/18&Over3.0WLost 23
L#1 DoublesJing Li / Lulu Cheng vs Violette de Bartillat / Boyoun Kim2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesCassie Pudup vs Gaohn Lee6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAdriana Levine / Suzy Arku-Nyadia vs Seoyun Jeong / Gretchen Arcila6-7, 3-5
W#2 SinglesYelena Pyatski vs Grace Lee6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSharon Jacobson / Svetlana Page-Natoli vs Irene Lee / Seongeun Tammy Lee2-6, 2-6
2025-06-05vs Sweeter ShotsLost 01
L#2 DoublesAdriana Levine / Audrey Gabel vs Mariquit Corcoran / Tara Callaghan4-6, 4-6
2025-05-29vs Dare DoublesLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Sepulveda / Joy Wheeler vs Fran Goldberg / Stephanie Springer2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Cassie Pudup
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Lulu Cheng
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Adriana Levine
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.05
Suzy Arku-Nyadia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Sharon Jacobson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Joy Wheeler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Diane Liporace
published 3
Diane Vero
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Svetlana Page-Natoli
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Audrey Gabel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Lisa Sommer-Balog
published
2.39
Debbie Miceli
published 3
2.35
Roselia Mouridy
published
Jennifer Sepulveda
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Spangenthal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Julia Eisenberg
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Natasha Aronberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nava Gnessin
published
Qi Lin
published
Valeria Mocci
published
Yelena Pyatski
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Felsenheld + Diane Vero3443% games−10.0% vs expected
Diane Liporace + Deborah Felsenheld3347% gamesnot enough data
Diane Liporace + Diane Vero224 matchesnot enough data
Sharon Jacobson + Lisa Sommer-Balog134 matchesnot enough data
Svetlana Page-Natoli + Diane Vero033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cassie Pudup
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Lulu Cheng
13W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
3
Adriana Levine
83W–51L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
Suzy Arku-Nyadia
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
Sharon Jacobson
21W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Joy Wheeler
18W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.87
3
Deborah Felsenheld
20W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Diane Liporace
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Diane Vero
21W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Svetlana Page-Natoli
17W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Audrey Gabel
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
8%90%1%
2.69
Lisa Sommer-Balog
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
3
Debbie Miceli
9W–13L career · type S · no lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.39
Roselia Mouridy
11W–17L career · no lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.35
Jennifer Sepulveda
19W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Spangenthal
12W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Julia Eisenberg
20W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Natasha Aronberg
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Nava Gnessin
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Qi Lin
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Valeria Mocci
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Yelena Pyatski
9W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.