Teams

Ioannou 8.5

2026 Baltimore Combo · Baltimore Combo 8.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 4.15 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-26vs Lance - BMore Beast ModeLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnn Greenbaum / Maureen Kolb vs Eboni Lance / Jean Acuna6-7, 4-5
L#2 DoublesAnne Blue / Madison Simmons vs Eve Helmer / Kimberly Ford5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAlicia Ault / Beth Steinberg vs Maneesha Ahluwalia / April Braxton4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-08-19vs Lance - BMore Beast ModeWon 21
L#1 DoublesAlicia Ault / Beth Steinberg vs Pamela Dean / Jean Acuna1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesDanielle Barry / Christine Ioannou vs Carol Besse / Maneesha Ahluwalia4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAlexandra Chafey / Janet Herbert vs Kate Dempsey / Jennifer Lee6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2026-08-15vs Lance - BMore Beast ModeLost 03
L#1 DoublesVirginia Fung / Maureen Kolb vs Georgi Lavinder / Jill Rose5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAlicia Ault / Julia Potter vs Pamela Dean / Ruzica Ragontse2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAnne Blue / Shelena Sanderson vs April Braxton / Cathy Preisendorfer4-6, 5-7
2026-08-12vs Lance - BMore Beast ModeLost 12
L#1 DoublesQuynh Tran / Beth Steinberg vs Vicki Williamson / Jill Rose2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJulia Potter / Joan Garlow vs Eboni Lance / Jennifer Exelby6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesAnne Blue / Madison Simmons vs Eve Helmer / Kimberly Ford4-6, 1-6
2026-08-05vs Lance - BMore Beast ModeLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoan Garlow / Julia Potter vs Michelle Cameron / Georgi Lavinder5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAlexandra Chafey / Shelena Sanderson vs April Braxton / Jennifer Exelby1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDanielle Barry / Christine Ioannou vs Pamela Dean / Cathy Preisendorfer6-4, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Baltimore Combo 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Maureen Kolb
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
Soyoung Lee
published
4.13
Shelena Sanderson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.09
Julia Potter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.00
Madison Simmons
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.97
Danielle Barry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.92
Beth Steinberg
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.86
Virginia Fung
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Ann Greenbaum
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Joan Garlow
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.77
Christine Ioannou
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Anne Blue
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.59
Alicia Ault
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.29
Alexandra Chafey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Janet Herbert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Greenbaum + Christine Ioannou5353% games+0.7% vs expected
Danielle Barry + Maureen Kolb134 matchesnot enough data
Virginia Fung + Joan Garlow303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Maureen Kolb
119W–83L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
4.27
Soyoung Lee
19W–11L career · no lines in 2026
15%84%1%
4.14
4.5
Shelena Sanderson
199W–141L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
4.13
Julia Potter
8W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
25%74%<1%
4.09
Madison Simmons
13W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
4.00
4.5
Danielle Barry
9W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
3.97
4.5
Beth Steinberg
12W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
3.92
Virginia Fung
60W–43L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Ann Greenbaum
34W–33L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Joan Garlow
156W–129L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Christine Ioannou
152W–115L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Anne Blue
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Alicia Ault
75W–50L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.59
3.5
Alexandra Chafey
7W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Janet Herbert
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.