Teams

TOC.Evans

2022 CTRL Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Combo 40 & Over 6.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-09-18vs TOHS.RiderWon 10
W#3 DoublesJamie Hinckley / Claire Little vs Gloria Hale / Cindy Bunce4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-08-29vs TOC.HutchensSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichele Mulcahy / Gerri Scanlon vs Sharon Herschman / Shelly Jude6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesStephanie Jabusch / Jamie Hinckley vs Amber Bruner / Dabney Sninski3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-08-27vs TOC.IrishWon 10
W#3 DoublesJamie Hinckley / Amy Condon vs Cecily Peterson / Carol Wooten6-1, 6-3
2022-08-20vs TOC.TerjesenSplit 11
L#1 DoublesStephanie Jabusch / Claire Little vs Traci Brooks / Theresa Rosario-Jansen4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMichele Mulcahy / Jamie Hinckley vs Nancy Pack / Betsy Terjesen6-1, 7-6
2022-08-13vs TOC.RMerckSplit 11
W#2 DoublesNajia Cheema / Claire Little vs Kelly Crawford / Suzanne Miller4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichele Mulcahy / Amy Condon vs Jennifer Johnson / Jennifer Straughn4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-08-06vs CAS KrasnerLost 12
W#1 DoublesClaire Little / Sharon Poindexter vs Wendy Armstrong / Judith McGowan6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDesiree Evans / Michele Mulcahy vs Tina Krasner / Tina Wiggins2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Condon / Jamie Hinckley vs Rebecca Lycan / Sheila Kelly-Corr6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 40 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Claire Little
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.46
Najia Cheema
published
3.31
Emily Yang
published 3.5
3.03
Jamie Hinckley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.94
Sharon Poindexter
published
2.88
Stephanie Jabusch
published
2.86
Michele Mulcahy
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jamie Hinckley + Michele Mulcahy111348% games+6.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Claire Little
137W–35L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.51
Najia Cheema
17W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Emily Yang
15W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.31
3
Jamie Hinckley
109W–139L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.03
Sharon Poindexter
1W–13L career · no lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
2.94
Stephanie Jabusch
25W–40L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Michele Mulcahy
150W–166L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.