Teams

MC YELLOW

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-05vs NJ ORANGELost 01
L#2 DoublesJerry Mogab / Chris Driscoll vs Steve Thompson / Mike Stewart6-7, 4-6
2023-08-29vs RHCC ORANGEWon 10
W#2 DoublesNathan Knepper / Tim Lennek vs Paul Kos / Bryan Dahler7-5, 7-6
2023-08-22vs MVCC SILVERSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJerry Mogab / Chris Driscoll vs Steven Hardegen / Chris Vogelsang7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTim Lennek / Nathan Knepper vs Paul Schwabe / Andrew Payne7-6, 6-4
2023-08-15vs CCC GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesTim Lennek / Jerry Mogab vs William Taylor / Stefan Wenger2-6, 2-6
2023-08-08vs KC-RH BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Waltz / Chris Driscoll vs Sean Kavanaugh / Mathew GILBERT1-6, 3-6
2023-07-25vs KC-CC YELLOWWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrian Fletcher / Chris Driscoll vs Ron Dart / Randy Lazzell6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Brad Arnold
published 3.5
3.42
Chris Driscoll
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.39
Matthew Moskal
published
3.32
Michael Waltz
published
3.21
Jim Greiner
published
3.17
Tim Lennek
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Claude Murray
published 3.5
2.94
Nathan Knepper
published
2.91
Brian Fletcher
published 3.5
Jerry Mogab
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jim Greiner + Brian Fletcher314 matchesnot enough data
Tim Lennek + Claude Murray123 matchesnot enough data
Jim Greiner + Michael Waltz213 matchesnot enough data
Michael Waltz + Brian Fletcher123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brad Arnold
20W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Chris Driscoll
58W–53L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.42
Matthew Moskal
25W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.39
Michael Waltz
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
Jim Greiner
10W–11L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Tim Lennek
73W–103L career · 3 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Claude Murray
11W–33L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.06
Nathan Knepper
2W–17L career · no lines in 2023
67%33%<1%
2.94
3.5
Brian Fletcher
5W–15L career · no lines in 2023
73%27%<1%
2.91
Jerry Mogab
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.